👍 Thank you for your reply and confirming that your deletions were intentional.

#HappyMapping

Reverted by changeset/169038712

Hi b-jazz, thank you very much for your feedback.

Yes, just a single hashtag from me as a comment is certainly not ideal, I should handle that differently in the future.

In this case, however, I don't believe any further action is necessary. I'm not aware of any major effort otherwise that is focused on the tags.

Best regards, Pascal

👍

"actually pretty close"? If I haven't overlooked anything, it's several hundred meters away.

@KhubsuratInsaan However, feel free to undo/revert my edit.

Based on the mentioned points, I decided to revert this node.

Furthermore see the "unhelpful" comment of the contributor here: changeset/168968181#map=19/28.632680/77.434057

Hi KhubsuratInsaan,
thanks for your comment. There is no building here where the company could be located. If you check the company's website mentioned, you’ll see that their headquarters is somewhere else.
Best regards

Same again, please see changeset/168978633

Hi pat-lachute, welcome to OSM.

Do you know the following OSM wiki page: osm.wiki/Keep_the_history

Best regards

👍 Thank you for your map updates.

Reverted by changeset/168968961

Some of the paths or trails—or at least portions of them—are still visible in the satellite imagery. As mentioned above, we typically use tags such as osm.wiki/Tag:access=, osm.wiki/Tag:abandoned=, or demolished= in situations like this.

Could you please revert your changeset and add the appropriate tags?

Thank you.

Thank you for your private message and confirming that your deletions were intentional.

Thank you for your private message and confirming that your deletions were intentional.

Thank you for your private message and confirming that your deletions were intentional.

Thank you for your private message and confirming that your deletions were intentional.

👍 Thank you for updating the element changeset/168888645

Thank you for your private message and confirming that your deletions were intentional.

Thank you for your private message and confirming that your deletions were intentional.

Revert of changeset/168620390