pitscheplatsch's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 158774212 | Reverted by changeset/158840783 |
|
| 158847515 | Revert of changeset/158847305 |
|
| 158847305 | Reverted by changeset/158847515 |
|
| 158797291 | Reverted by |
|
| 158798266 | Thank you for your private message and for confirming that the data was intentionally deleted. However, I still hold a differing perspective. If the streets and buildings are visible in the aerial image, they should be represented in the OSM database. |
|
| 158792274 | Revert of changeset/158792189 |
|
| 158792189 | Reverted by changeset/158792274 |
|
| 157682107 | I think so, yes. |
|
| 157682107 | Based on your question in your PM: The bot has checked the name "Pilal da mata" for the created water well. During the review, the bot decided that the chosen name was rather unusual for this type of map element. So it left a marker here on the changeset. |
|
| 158688901 | The user has also been deleted. |
|
| 158688942 | The user has also been deleted. |
|
| 158702345 | Thank you for your reply. Which nature reserve do you mean exactly? After a quick check of the map of the Bundesamt für Naturschutz, I couldn't find a protected area for this changeset or the deleted paths. The following way is an exception and was correctly tagged: way/1133683928/history Unfortunately, you also removed it. |
|
| 158702512 | Thanks for your reply. Which nature reserve do you mean exactly? After a quick check of the map of the Bundesamt für Naturschutz, I couldn't find a protected area for this changeset or the deleted path. |
|
| 158562540 | Ok, some contributors have added buildings, while others have occasionally removed them at a later time. |
|
| 158542682 | Hi Filipe Pinheiro, welcome to OSM. Could you please have a look at the following wiki page for object mapping and naming: osm.wiki/Good_practice#Don't_use_name_tag_to_describe_things Thanks! |
|
| 158533273 | Hi omalabo,
Did you check the boundaries against existing OSM data before importing them here? In other words, was the dataset checked for possible redundancies and corrected if necessary? Thank you. |
|
| 158526034 | Same "issue" as mentioned here: changeset/158523576 |
|
| 158524645 | Same "issue" as mentioned here: changeset/158523576 |
|
| 158523576 | Which shapefile do you mean exactly? Was the data not collected by yourself or is it a data import? |
|
| 158523576 | Hi omalabo, thank you for your contributions. Why did you capitalise each name? |