Ok thanks for clarifying :)

Hi @cs09736, I just noticed that the construction status was removed. I would argue that it should be retained until it is open for passenger service as it is not yet fully completed. Thanks!

Hi there, thanks for your edits! Just to clarify that the path in Eva Tilley Reserve does not connect through westwards as there is a fence and a locked gate in the way. I've since fixed it but just so you're aware. Thanks :)

Hi Kieran, thanks very much for your edits! Just a note that I've removed Carnbourne East and Clyde North railway stations as there isn't any active plan to construct these stations. As per the OSM Wiki under 'Key:proposed': "Objects without clear evidence that there is some real active plan to construct it should be removed from data."
Hopefully in the future this changes, but for now they're best left off the map.
Thanks!

Hi thanks for these edits :) Just to clarify that these and similar footpaths tagged as bicycle=yes should not be tagged in this way. They're standard footpaths where bicycles are not permitted to ride as per Victorian Road Rules. I understand that there technically isn't a 'shared path end' sign, but as there is a road between the Gardiners Creek Trail and these paths, that doesn't require such a sign to exist.

Hi! Me again, same question as before - what's the rationale/source for changing this road from secondary to primary?

Hi! Thanks for your edit. Just wondering what your rationale/source is for changing the road classification from secondary to primary?

Hi!

You're absolutely right, it should be surface=cobblestone. Not sure why I tagged it was surface=cobbled.

Thanks

Hi Warin61, thanks for letting me know! I do miss some of them sometimes as you can see but I will pay more careful attention in the future.

Hi Ed! Hope you're doing well. Just on tagging the cycle lanes as a separate way, I note on the tagging guidelines and general practice in Melbourne is to add tags to the roadway rather than as a separate highway=cycleway: osm.wiki/Bicycle#Cycle_lanes_in_bidirectional_motor_car_roads Are you ok if we remove the cycleway here on this basis?

Hi there, I'd be interested to know what source you've used to change the classification of Southern Road and Chifley Drive. I can't see anything from the Council or VicRoads to indicate any change in classification.

Thanks Warin61, good point! I'll switch that over now

Hi thanks for your contribution to Openstreetmap! Just flagging that these tags are not level crossings in real life. These are tram tracks operating in mixed traffic conditions on roads without their own right of way. I've removed the ones that I can find but just FYI for the future. Thanks!

Hi there! Thanks for your edits @MapAbility. Just a note that railway=tram_crossing is not really for use in mixed traffic conditions like in Melbourne. Really only where the tram is separated from traffic in its own right of way and a path or road crosses. Happy to chat further, thanks!

Hi Bob42nd sorry I missed your comment. The geometry is based on the EES here, including the station locations which are in separate documents for each precinct: https://bigbuild.vic.gov.au/projects/suburban-rail-loop/planning/ees Sorry I should have been more specific.

Hi there, you may recall some years ago that we had a discussion about not using the railway=station tag on disused/abandoned stations. I can see that this has happened again, so just a friendly reminder to please use the appropriate tag (e.g. railway:historic=station) instead. Thanks.

Hi there, this path does not connect to the driveway in real life. I have checked this twice with an on-site survey.

Hi, thanks for your contribution! I've also sent two messages, but just in case they didn't come through, the station tags for the Outer Circle Line are incorrect. They have since been changed back to railway:history=station_site as per the consensus here: osm.wiki/Railway_stations#Stations_and_sites_which_are_not_currently_in_operation

Thank you!

No such park exists, it's two private tennis courts. Removed area.