Hej!
Du lämnade ett fel här i en MP. Se http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=17.71099&lat=62.55870&zoom=15&opacity=0.66
Fixar du själv eller ska jag göra det?

Stort tack för detta! Vilket jobb :)
Jag fixade just ett fel där nod 6947407866 var inblandad i en touching rings fel.

Hi! Welcome to OSM
Your edit broke this relation relation/7625017#map=11/62.7164/18.0790 because the rings now intersect. The result is that Hemsön lost its name on the map.
I recommend you to edit with JOSM only in this area as it has a lot of multipolygons. (iD is a terrible editor that does not warn properly when things break)

Hej!
Relationen 8710463 är trasig efter att du mappat. Kan du fixa den själv eller vill du att jag gör det?
Är det inte dags för sig att byta till JOSM där du automatisk bliver varnad om du råkar ha sönder MPerna?
Mvh
pangoSE

Hi
Thanks for this edit. :)

Jag ser att du anvender en udda editor. Jag rekommenderar varmt att ladda ner JOSM på en vanlig dator. Då går det mycket snabbare och smidigare att lägga in grejor.

Hej och välkommen!
Stort tack för ditt bidrag.
Mvh
pangoSE

Hej och välkommen!
Stort tack för ditt bidrag.
Mvh
pangoSE

Nice work! :)

I did not check lately, but has iD recently gained MP-edit improvements? If not this might be accidental.
I warmly recommend JOSM to any serious mapper not just adding a few details here and there.

Hi.
Please stop this edit war at once. I urge you to discuss using words instead of resorting to reverting reverts.
Please see my comment here changeset/76302776

Looking closer at the examples I would like to comment on this one:
relation/1618116#map=12/48.9103/13.5324
This one is in my view way too complex and contains an awful lot of inners. I try to keep my MPs simple (below 20 inners) as I am aware of the increase in complexity they bring.

Hi bosseln, thanks for joining the discussion. I would really prefer if you two could agree on when to use MPs and when not to.

Archie made a, to me, valid point that MPs can/should cross a road if it is a woody area and the road is smaller than a trunk. In my view the forest came first and the road is merely an addition to it, not something dividing it. CartoOSM draw roads on top just fine. Power lines on the other hand merit other landuse-tagging because they are kept cut down. Similarly the sides of trunk roads are often kept down for traffic security reasons and should be tagged accordingly.

We have so many details still missing on our Swedish map. I would much prefer if you could focus on having fun mapping and diverge as little energy as possible to reverts and conflict.
Cheers

Thanks for extending this. On maxar there are paths in the area which are missing. Could you add those as well? Also please split the reservoirs in two as they are clearly not joined (besides maybe by a culvert)

Have you verified this on site?

This edit looks good, thanks!

Hej, visst pratar du svenska?
Jag undrar varför du mappar service=alley på vägar på landet? se service=alley för definitionen av bakgata
Jag skulle föredra om du taggar dem unclassified om inte vägen går till ett enstaka hus.

Also looking at your comments on your cs they are generally very lacking. You should really explain what you are doing/trying to do so others can help/review.

I agree with archie this should be reverted.

bosseln could you please stop deleting and reverting and focus instead on adding stuff that is missing in the next weeks until you gain more experience as a mapper?

maybe find a mentor? contact your local mapping community through one of the mailing lists and have someone help you learn how to do it right.

Hi, Welcome to OSM
What did you try to do in this edit?
It seems wrong to me as you deleted a lot of nodes.

Could you please elaborate?