Thank you for suggestion, I will be more careful while merging these nodes.

Noted with thanks!!

Acknowledged, this won't happen again.

It will be reversed soon, thank you!!

Thank you for your kind reaction, this building was named as " Jay Peak Resort" on Mapping sites that i have been using and there was not mentioned it as ski resort so I thought it was only a building for this business so i tagged it as resort, but now i changed this, thanks!

Hi aweech,
Thank you for your concern, I always use 'q' button after making bounding box and there was not expanded form of the address on OSM for this I left as it was available.

We are on discussion on this topic with our team , we will surely consider this matter and thanks

Hi karsonkevin2,
I do not get it what's problem on this edit, I always have been through other imagery too to insure if the building for the given business is accurate or not. About building tags I will be more careful on that from now on.

Thank you so much for the suggestion , i will be careful on such cases from now on.

I will concern with my team and do as you have told but it will take time so i would like to apologize for that.

It was edited a month ago so the edits we have done month ago or few weeks ago are like same way on some cases , we assure you to do our best to not to repeat these kinds of mistakes on future edits. Thanks!!

Sorry for the inconvenience we had made, we will be more careful regarding this matter from now on.

Sorry for the inconvenience we had made, we will be more careful regarding this matter from now on.

Sorry for the inconvenience we had made, we will be more careful regarding this matter from now on.

Sorry for the inconvenience we had made, we will be more careful regarding this matter from now on.

Sorry for the inconvenience we had made, we will be more careful regarding this matter from now on.

Sorry for the inconvenience we had made, we will be more careful regarding this matter from now on.

We are notatying per guidance from OSM user osm.wiki/User:Lyx on our Talk for Zartico here: osm.wiki/Talk:Zartico. so we did that but we understand what should have done regarding node conversion to way now, we assure to follow the above pattern on new work regarding this problems.

Thank you so much for your suggestions, our team also up to correct these mistakes on upcoming days.Once again thanks for the concern.

We are notatying per guidance from OSM user osm.wiki/User:Lyx on our Talk for Zartico here: osm.wiki/Talk:Zartico.

What you are suggesting is in conflict with that guidance and the One feature, one OSM element guidance. Please contact @Eddie%20Cannon to clarify.