A borostyánkő utat beigazítottam FÖMI-hez, ezt elfelejtettem írni

Amit Osmanddal csinálok az saját felmérés, csak az Osmand nem rakja hozzá hogy survey
--
All things I map with Osmand are my survey, just the app forgets to add source=survey.

Can you please elaborate on what was your changeset's intent? because a dot won't help me understand the intent :)
osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

I also used Bing for tracing just I forgot to include it.

Ok that's not Jackson County, just only Mason County.

*Washington County PA. (just the boundary of the project is a bit bigger)

typo. landcover. Also where: Essex County VT and Connecticut River

I also aligned WV 32 because it was a bit off.

I should've mentioned Esri World Imagery (non-clarity), but I forgot to put there. Most of the work was done from NAIP and Bing

https://transportation.wv.gov/highways/traffic/TEDs/TED220.pdf
https://transportation.wv.gov/highways/engineering/Documents/Publications%20Committee%20Meeting/DGFS%20-%20FINAL%2002.08.17.pdf#page=178
I seperated the links badly

Note that one of the forest multipolygons, namely 14205318 doesn't have all of its clearings mapped. Will do tomorrow but right now I have to go to sleep (and this is a note for me to continue it)

I also did tagging changes at a parking lot

*sorry for the typo, i meant It's good to see that we know what are your intentions.

Oh, i see. Thank you for your response! :) Now I see that you listened to us. It's good to see that know we know what is your intention.

Why is your changeset is as large as PA?
Also, please, give a good changeset comment, not just an out-of-context changeset.
Eg. "added businesses in the area of State College, PA."
Or: "Updated roads near State College PA." See more at:
osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Also, please respond to our comments, like "Ok, I understood, I will do it better", because in my opinion, ghosting/ignoring is a very rude thing. Thank you for your cooperation.

Javítva a nagy része. Ha még találsz valahol hibát, légyszi szólj.

Á ja. Megvan. a JOSM kissé szemét volt velem, amikor a Mátra multipolygonját frissítettem, a JOSM képes az ugyanolyan tagjű polygonokról leszedni ugyanazt tehát landuse=foresten belüli landuse=forest tageket mind kukázta. ezt máris orvosolom, csak "lukasztgattam" a Mátrát ahol tényleg nem voltak fák.

Lehet JOSM-ből majd csinálok egy query-t rá a changesetem alapján, mert tényleg érdekel hol ronthattam el. :)

Megtudnád légyszíves mutatni melyik érintett polygonokról van szó? Én ilyenre nem emlékeznék, hogy landuse=forest címkéket töröltem volna valahonnan.

I forgot to include here Esri world imagery too, I always have the tick in JOSM to automatically include visible layers, just I had Esri turned off.