Ja, hogy utas nem tudott oda tervezni, akkor ott hagyom, csak attól függetlenül maga az utas tudja hibásan a címet

Hali! Tudtommal nem létezik a Szentmihályi út 1., mert az a Borhy Kertészetnek a telkén van, de az a Régi Fóti útra nyílik, a táblákon levő adatokat nem mindig szoktam felvinni, csak ha közelítően kéne. a házszám

A táblán ez áll: Szentmihályi út 1->1, de nem azt jelenti hogy ott ténylegesen van hozzátartozó házszám, de javíts ki, ha tévedek (van róla fotóm a tábláról, az egész környéket felmértem tavaly február-március között)

Hello! Sorry, but I mapped the forest and we distinguish the state forest boundaries from landcover boundaries. The state forest boundaries don't usually respect the landcover boundaries, and in OSM we rarely tag state forests as landuse=forest, we only do that if the state forest respects the landcover boundary 100%.

I'd have to discuss this in #local-michigan in OSM US Slack(https://slack.openstreetmap.us/) what the other Michigander support, like this that only the state forest cover is supported, or also the non-state forest cover.

By the way, not entire Michigan is forested, the southern part is literally a dairy land.

For some reason a long power line was modified hence the changeset size is big

The area is big because there were conflicts with some relations or ways

Oh yes, i changed a part of a river of Tug Fork to Elkhorn Creek. That was from the "USA Topo Maps" imagery, just i forgot to write that in source.

way/1011040610/
Hello, i just want you to notice that you have to split the wooded land which i linked because there are some hollers and residential area in it. Thanks :) You should never map a forest that way, i suggest you map the forest around the roads so where you can see the road, just follow its outline but not overdrawing it especially if it's a major road , not a road that goes into a holler (and especially not over a residential area). If you have any more questions, feel free to reach me out (btw I prefer JOSM for mapping wooded landcover)

Please stay away from old tagging of the rivers. Thanks.

Yep, MapSpot is right. Please don't retag it.

I know that, but that doesn't fit the definition. It's a long recurring question, because according to a local(asdfjkll), it's not a nature_reserve nor a protected area. It's a State Park, a one of its kind.

I also used TIGER Roads 2020 if some road names have changed but if not, i only edited the names from Dr => Drive, Rd => Road etc

Wow, you did a lot of descriptive things on the roads. Although, sometimes i had to change the tagging to match up your descriptions and the OSM tagging scheme. But yea, thanks for these info!

+ detailed a park

*ponds, lake is bigger than that.

I also used TIGER Roads 2020 for determining road path just i forgot to put it in the sources. (lol)

Retraced relation/3881986 as you wrote "fixme=retrace" but i also noticed that the polygon wasn't aligned

Na látom sikerült mégis csak megcsinálni a templom 3D modelljét. :) Szép munka

Ah, it makes sense

I hope you will fix the forest boundary because the w:1000645713 isn't accurate, it overlaps into houses and such

Á, most már értem. Köszi, amúgy pont azért néztem ezt meg mert ott volt a review_requested=yes a changesetben és akkor már így rálestem. Erre mondjuk pont nem emlékeztem hogy ott az autósoknak szívás volt a kijövetel, a SPAR-ba ugyanis nem mentem soha, hanem az OBI melletti SPAR-ba mentem amikor kellett menni