OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
104662309

Yes, I know about the issue, i might revert the thing, because actually there are 3-4 changesets affected by this. The WV GIS TC told something to wolfgang8741 that "everything can be used of WV GIS Clearinghouse to OSM (public domain), unless explicitly stated". The problem is, that on WV GIS TC there is a declaration "imagery web service is for view only", but why don't they just grant permission? It is weird, because the Clearinghouse has the purpose to reuse something. Actually, this question is on rise on OSMUS Slack, but we haven't gotten any reply back from wolfgang8741 on the issue, because he spoke last time with Kurt Donaldson and Frank LaFone.
The problem is, that they didn't explicitly stated the stuff.

Because you warned me (also DUGA warned me), i think i have to revert the stuff which contains the "WV GIS TC Imagery" like this changeset, and if any of the WVU members grant permission only for OSM mappers to trace their imagery, then the stuff i could not trace from NAIP/Maxar/Bing/Esri will be corrected.

I hope this clarification is good.

103095782

Well, i asked it in Discord and i got it that the cut-off areas should be mapped as scrub

103095782

Some areas have cut logs, but those don't belong into the forest anymore, unless it's going to be readded. For more questions, feel free to ask, since i'm an experienced mapper. :)
I'm available on slack.openstreetmap.us.

103095782

When you try to add forest please try to map along the forest outline so where there is no trees, don't make it into a forest. (relation/12718765 see this for example or this: relation/12702006)
I hope you'll keep onto this guidelines. :)

104744325

And also i aligned a lot of stuff.

87091597

Á, így már világos.

87091597

De szerintem ebből nem fogsz több ilyet találni mert azóta én is rendberaktam a környéket eléggé, amikor házszámoztam teljesen a környékem

87091597

Hmm. Amikor én címkézgettem fel a dolgokat általában nem sablonból csináltam hanem mindig felvittem hogy leisure=swimming_pool, és ennyi. de tényleg nem tudom miért nem vettem le róla, általában, ami szögletes dolog, azt a buildings_tools-szal lerajzoltam, csak van, hogy elfelejtettem levenni róla a building=yes-t. ennyi. :D

87091597

amúgy a buildings toolst használtam amikor csináltam a környéket és auto felrakja a building=yes címkét mindenre.

87091597

Szia! az lehet véletlen volt :) Ha megtudod adni melyik objektumról lenne szó, leveszem róla, vagy akár te is leveheted. Köszi :)

104597179

No comment, again, the batch upload is an ass in JOSM, maybe i don't do this.

What i did is that i drew creeks, roads, forests, and did the TIGER cleanup, that's why you can see a lot of source.

104558821

also traced it from Esri World imagery

104476969

and did the tiger fixup as always, that's somehow been not written there lol

103864073

I'm going to draw instead the wooden areas, since that's what I'm doing recently in the Beckley metropolitan area.

103864073

changeset/104430549
also see
osm.wiki/Proposed_features/Park_boundary
even if it's proposed, the description might be useful

104378474

Here not Cross fork but Johnsonburg.

104210394

changeset/104210397 actually this is where i applied this technique

104210394

Yeah, actually I'm doing that on some stuff, and it makes sense, but at some parts it was ugly and it would be time consuming to align it.

104248398

And also some service roads.

104210394

To recap what i did, I added forests and added roads. But I also removed some of the landuses, and huge batches of forest, because of the quality of what I draw wasn't good enough, it wasn't snapped to other stuff like waterbody and it looked weird. But i want to snap it so it looks better but doing it manually (without the JOSM's follow line tool) it's a pain.