Bocsi,
"tehergépkocsival behajtani tilos (12t zóna) "
De a lényeg átjön
maxweightrating:hgv=12

I also used USGS 3DEP and Esri world imagery clarity beta just I forgot to write them into the source tags.

I removed the bridge=yes because on Imagery (like Bing) it's only a bridge where it crosses the stream

To be honest, I like to map those counties which have mostly woods(80+%) and not those which have a lot of farming land or cutlines because that makes the process slower for manual tracing.

Well, I decided to map Vermont because I saw that there is some very wooded area in the Northeast Kingdom and I was like "why not, I'm good at mapping woods and I know that Vermont should be green by means of wood landcover". And I know that there are few mappers from Vermont who also map woods now and then.

My main project right now is to have West Virginia's forest landcover complete hopefully in one or two years.(For WV, I also know a few friends who either live or have some of their relatives there)

Is the entirety of River Road a bridge? from imagery it doesn't look if it was one. (I'm mapping landcover there and I just noticed this)

*no, as I checked on the internet Wellsburg is the county seat. Nevertheless, Follansbee is still a town in OSM terms

I mixed the term with the MSA so this is Metropolitan Statistical Area

Oh, I forgot to say, I also use the TIGER Roads 2020 (or previous years) overlay, since it happens that some road segments can be barely seen from other imageries too.

By the way, Bing has recently updated its imageries in most of the counties in WV, so you have high quality and recent ones from 2020. Okay, the roads can't be seen by the amount of trees at certain parts, but this is why it's good for mapping wooded landcover. For aligning roads I always use a mixture of multiple imageries(NAIP;Bing;Esri;Mapbox) if I align roads, so I compare them and where I can see the road better, and which is the best aligned. But I assume you follow this technique.

Also, you've made a lot of good work in the entire US for tidying up the notorious TIGER roads! So kudos for that. Keep doing that :)

Oh! I see. I actually realigned entire Marshall and Raleigh Counties in the state, and I only removed the tiger:reviewed=no if I considered that the road segments are aligned, and they have ref=* tags, the street names aren't abbreviated (since even if there was an experiment to kill off the abbreviated names a while ago before I used JOSM on a high level, there are still a lot of leftovers) etc

In JOSM there is a super cool "Map Paint Style" called tiger:reviewed=no and when I'm aligning roads, I take advantage of that it displays which road segments have that tagging by yellowish color, thus I can track my progress which roads are left.
I got to learn this map style by a native WV friend who aligned Gilmer County's roads last year. (As far as I remember he showed me an extract of what is remaining of the tiger:review=no tagged roads once on either OSMUS Slack or on other chat platform)

So this is the value I can see of the tag in the US that if someone deleted that tag, I assume someone touched it and aligned that segment so I don't have to deal with it.

way/15664914
If you happen to delete tiger:reviewed=no, make it sure it's aligned to the imagery :) I have to align this, I just noticed this while mapping woods

*CDP = like regarding in the metropolitan areas it doesn't appear, only Charleston appears to be in the metropolitan CDP map

New Martinsville is not a village :D it has 5k population, even in Hungarian terms we say "town" And it's a county seat

I also used Esri World Imagery for tracing the creek but for some reason I forgot to include it. My apologies

Hali! a 3-as főút relációjába belerondítottál Gödöllőnél és Hatvannál. Légyszi kerüld a körforgalmak sorrendjének átrendezését, mert az nem helyes, ha a körforgalmaknál a tagok nem egymás után vannak, az azt jelenti, hogy szakadás van a körforgalomba.
A körforgalmaknak úgy van a sorrendjük, hogy ahogy az út belemegy a körforgalomba, mint egy utas, aki át hajt rajta, megy át keresztül, ha meg kihajtottál a körforgalomból akkor odáig tart az adott forward szakasz amíg nem torkollik egy nem oneway szakaszba, és mivel ott van a visszafele út is, a forward way-sorozatnak az első pontjából akkor a másik irányból kellene megközelíteni ugyanazt a node-ot így elkerülve a szakadást. De azokat a tagokat, amiket pl egy kamion nem szokott használni mert nem megy körbe-körbe akkor azokat kihagyjuk.
(Így helyes csinálni, nézd meg majd a reláció jelenlegi változatát, a JOSM se mutat semmilyen szakadást)

Well, I just noticed that the forest doesn't render that's why I corrected part of it where the fault was but I'm not planning to correct Colorado. I'm mapping WV these days

Why did you delete landuse=residential?
Please don't do corrections in Hungary if you just break things. Thank you

You just made a rupture in the route nr. 7 relation, which I have to fix

Hehe :D Thanks! Actually the wiki project lists almost every changesets associated with this landcover project