Hallo user_7031,
wenn ich das stichprobenartig richtig festgestellt habe, scheinst du viele der squad=* einträge vor vielen Jahren in OSM erfasst zu haben. Ich habe im Forum den Vorschlag in den Raum gestellt, diese Einträge zu löschen, da sie veraltet/fehlerhaft sind. Was hältst du davon? Vielleicht möchtest du dich ja an der Diskussion beteiligen:
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/massenanderungsvorschlag-zur-loschung-von-squad/110531

Hi Axman6,
I've just found this changeset. The situation is probably similar to the other one:
changeset/148574189
The details of the station should probably be applyed to the whole area and not to the buildings.

Thanks for your response. That sounds like a good plan. If you need further help feel free to ask.

Hello at_bus,
you just edited here something that is tagged with emergency=ses_station:
way/380886929
This tag is deprecated. Can you maybe check if this place should instead be tagged with emergency=disaster_response?
emergency=disaster_response

If you are not sure that is fine. Than we can just keep it as it is. Thanks in advance.

Hello Axman6 and welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've seen that you added two SES-stations here:
way/1262048405
way/1262048409

Are these realy seperate stations directly next to each other or is it one station with two buildings? For me it looks more as if the fenced area is one station. Is that the case?

Thanks for updating them. I now also updated the two former stations:
way/401428594
way/255888443

Thanks for your help.

Thanks a lot for your help.

Ok, that seems like the plan for upading the area is in good hands with you. Thanks for that support.

Hi joost shouppe,
you edited at least two objects of the Belgian Civil Protection here:
way/259612616
way/362929152
They currently use amenity=emergency_service which is deprecated now. Is it possible, that emergency=disaster_response is the fitting replacement for them?

emergency=disaster_response

Thanks for that info! :)

Hi huincul,
thanks for adding this station here.

You used amenity=rescue_station and emergency=disaster_response on one object. Using both of them is strange as these tags describe similar but different things. Does this place fit to the wiki page of emergency=disaster_response?
emergency=disaster_response
If not, than amenity=rescue_station could possibly fit.
amenity=rescue_station
Which one fits better?

I have no knowlege about the situation in Argentina. Is "Equipo Técnico de Acción ante Catástrofes" realy the name of this place or is it just the operating organisation?

Thanks for your contribution towards OpenStreetMap!

I just split the single object into two different ones:
changeset/148476602
I added a fixme for the unclear exact positioning. Do you know what the emergency=disaster_response one is called? Is it just "Sala Operativa"?

Feel free to further improve the tagging. My limited knowlege prevents me from adding more details.

Thanks a lot for you detailed answer. That sounds like two seperate real world objects. Is that the case? Maybe we could create one "Centro situazioni" that could possibly be an office=government and one "Sala Operativa Provinziale" tagged with emergency=disaster_response?

Thanks for the reply.

I will note that this place is mapped according to the now approved definition. Thanks for your suport!

Hi TheCavalery,
I think you made a typo here:
way/971204739
I think insetead of the amenity=* it should possibly be emergency=water_rescue. Do you agree?
emergency=water_rescue

Thanks for the response!

As your interpretation of the situation seems to be only based on the name I opened a note to make the question more public:
note/4147384

Hi MarcoR,
you mapped here something using emergency=disaster_response before the proposal for this tag got approved. Can you confirm that this object fits to the current definition in the wiki?

node/10032946071
emergency=disaster_response