OpenStreetMap
ortho_is_hot's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 78136989 | Ah I see there is a relation also for each direction of services as well that I missed, thanks. As for network, I think "Sydney Light Rail" because it's in line with the rest of the transport network (Sydney Buses, Sydney Trains, etc), it has a website called "Sydney light rail" (includes the L1 as well), and its own(ish) wikidata identifier (Q771666) |
|
| 77807463 | *eastbound NOT westbound |
|
| 77732507 | Updated in changeset/77752703 |
|
| 77732507 | Fair point, I'll go ahead and make that adjustment now. It seems that their main signage is present on Brighton Boulevard hence why they advertise that address but I see your point |
|
| 77732507 | I queried the address on sixmaps and it showed it as being "
|
|
| 77635394 | Apologies for messing up the realtions-as far as I could tell, all of the administrative boundaries were closed when I was editing. I have fixed (as far as I can tell) the turn restrictions in changeset/77713074. Thanks for pointing out the issue. |
|
| 77634013 | How would you go about specifying that other road users can't use the lane? I checked taginfo and agree that psv:lanes and the like have more total uses than access:lanes, so its the more agreed upon option |
|
| 77655977 | Sorry, that was a typo. I've fixed it now, thanks for pointing that error out |
|
| 77551338 | Yeah, I noticed the activity on that changeset. I just couldn't leave the comments blank. Perhaps if the user contributes in the future, I'm not sure. |
|
| 77551338 | G'day PegahMir, In regards to your recent contributions—all of your changeset comments are "Some changes have been made" which isn't particularly helpful to other mappers when reviewing object history. It would be appreciated if your comments could specify what you have changed, for example "Removed plumber from Canada Building and created a separate node for the plumber" Regards,
|
|
| 76176791 | I'll admit, I was expecting you to say something like that. Although you are spot on—iD doesn't recognise this tag yet for whatever reason. Might have to put a GH issue to add this as a feature. |
|
| 76176791 | My thought process was that with a lot of different relations around here it would be beneficial to have "Destination sign to xyz" show up rather than relation/12345, in iD at least. Although granted, they don't specifically need a name |
|
| 76142592 | No worries! Good to see this sort of navigation data being added |
|
| 76142592 | In regards to the destination_sign relation, that is the same way that I have been doing it an osmose has not reported any errors so far. Looks good |
|
| 76047788 | It seems that operator:abn has 25 uses all in Australia. Maybe that's a better tag? I can't see operator:ref:abn in taginfo. |
|
| 74978460 | G'day,
Regards,
|
|
| 74979417 | G'day,
Regards,
|
|
| 74983067 | G'day,
Regards,
|
|
| 74932741 | G'day, Just commenting because you have requested a review of the changeset. The changes to way/548493210 are correct, as it is not a sidewalk. If you want, you can add surface=grass or whatever is relevant to the way which is more precise than surface=unpaved. As for way/728238089 it would be helpful to add the type of path, whether that be for vehicles, pedestrians, cyclists, etc. The two other paths between streets appear to be correct. The path along Croudace Bay Road also appears to be correct. Thanks for your contribution—if you need any help with editing feel free to ask. Regards,
|
|
| 74884960 | G'day, Just commenting because you requested a review on this changeset. I have looked at the changes that you have made. The driveways are correct and so is the pier. With the pier, the way can be split where it becomes a concrete path, tagged as highway=footway or "Foot Path" in the iD editor. Thanks for your contribution. Regards,
|