ortho_is_hot's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 93352799 | Hi, from what I can tell none of these bus lanes are physically separated from the main road and my understanding is that they shouldn't exist as separate ways if they are just separate lanes. Cheers,
|
|
| 93352056 | Hi, is lanes:bus not correct? From the usage statistics it seems to be accepted tagging to me? Cheers,
|
|
| 93350598 | Hi, if you switch to Maxar Premium Imagery, you can see all of the details (you may have to realign it to the existing data). Also roads into a shopping centre are tagged as highway=service since they aren't residential roads. Cheers,
|
|
| 93313477 | Whoops, I stand corrected, I was talking about a different roadway |
|
| 93325981 | Hi there, I've changed the speed cameras back to traffic lights where the tags were moved to highway_1. Cheers,
|
|
| 93325095 | Hi there, generally its best to preserve the history of objects in the map e.g. resize and re-circularise a roundabout instead of deleting the roundabout and redrawing. Cheers,
|
|
| 93323991 | Hi there, generally unless a name is signposted for a road it's unnecessary, e.g. the service road. More info: osm.wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions Cheers,
|
|
| 93323394 | Hi there, generally adding a name to a feature isn't necessary unless its specifically signposted as a name. For instance, the name "Cricket net" isn't necessary as the fact that it is an area for cricket is implied by the tags: leisure=pitch and sport=cricket. Cheers,
|
|
| 93322714 | Hi there, the objects you tagged as wastewater plants are probably better tagged as storage tanks -- there is a preset for "water tank" within iD. Cheers,
|
|
| 93322511 | Hi there, the name tag on buildings generally isn't needed for petrol station roofs, generally all the name information goes on the petrol station node/area. Also, the petrol station information (amenity=fuel) needs to be on only one object - either the area outline that you added or the main building. It can't be on both otherwise its technically duplicating the same feature. Cheers,
|
|
| 93326062 | Hi there, with speed cameras, you only need a single node at the location of the device (e.g. not connected to the way), and then the roadways that the speed camera takes readings can be marked with osm.wiki/Relation:enforcement If you need help setting this up then let me know. Cheers,
|
|
| 93321810 | Hi there, generally with slip lanes it's best to start the new way from where there is physical separation, e.g. not following next to the roadway until it becomes physical separation, for example: osm.org/edit#map=20/-34.02577/150.72660 Cheers,
|
|
| 93320450 | Hi there, I think you might've got capacity and capacity:disabled the wrong way round on the parking lot. Cheers,
|
|
| 93313477 | Agree with aharvey, although you can't really legally drop off in a private vehicle in this sort of area, the road itself isn't restricted as far as I'm aware. |
|
| 93312919 | Hi there, does https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/node/6115515732 crossing not exist any more? Cheers,
|
|
| 93292358 | I've removed the construction tags on this and also corrected the speed limits as the onramps on the southern end are 70km/hr, not 60km/hr |
|
| 93292358 | Hi, what source is the speed limit and lanes from that is odbl compliant? Cheers,
|
|
| 93214836 | I've reverted this in changeset/93261215 As aharvey has said if there's a reason that has been overlooked for its removal or adjustment then it can be changed again if necessary. Cheers,
|
|
| 93214836 | Hi, should the label not be part of the administrative relation? From what I can see it had the role of label. Cheers,
|
|
| 93129213 | Hi, similar with changeset/90688012 I've added back the highway tag (in 93148594) which defines the way as a road otherwise it is not routable for any vehicle. I can't see anything that would stop a bus from routing over these roads, apart from one of the segments having a maxweight of 16t. Perhaps this is what the router is balking at? Cheers,
|