Has all of this construction been completed and open to traffic?

Hi, I've reverted this in changeset/91932503 for the above reasons. In terms of odbl compliant sources, you can use both mapillary and openstreetcam which both have coverage in this area.

Regards,
ortho_is_hot

Based on a survey today, I've added the path back in changeset/91760161 I've connected it to the parking lot so it's more obvious that it doesn't connect to Dickson Lane

G'day and welcome to OSM,

The parking lots that you modified need to form the outline of all the parking spaces, instead of being a small area (e.g. how they were mapped in the first version here: https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/643551809). I've updated these in changeset/91475264

Cheers,
ortho_is_hot

Hi, has https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/760568762 been demolished?

Your vandalism has been reverted: changeset/91270309

Regards,
ortho_is_hot

My best guess is that you wanted to apply the preset to something else but mis-clicked the multipolygon

I've added the other one here: changeset/91254020

It essentially does the same thing -- the shoulder changes path to guide you into the separated cycleway (with a bicycles must exit), and straight after the tunnel portal is fully underground, it reconnects with the M1 shoulder (with a watch for bicycles sign installed within the past couple of months).

Thanks, from what I can see it's meant to be a separated version of the cross here with care, and that it makes its way somewhat sharply from the east side of the building to the west side of the tunnel exit. Good luck cycling on the freeway though, I couldn't do it myself in a million years. As for the other side, I've got some dashcam footage going away which I can check up on and add tomorrow.

I've added highway=service back in 91215878

Hi, it seem's you've flooded Mooney Mooney—I've changed the multipolygon back to a forest instead of a reservoir in 91215444

Cheers,
ortho_is_hot

Hi, highway=service is necessary on parking aisles as highway=* specifies that they are a road, without it it's just a line that is not routable.

Cheers,
ortho_is_hot

Hi, is 'designated' meant to be 'destination'?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91117224

G'day and welcome to OSM,

Since this is an important feature, I've reverted this in changeset/91119114

Discussion over the issue of tagging the harbour bridge did occur on this changeset changeset/87315727 and it seems to me like a reasonable conclusion. If you think it still should be changed, I would recommend some form of community discussion, since this issue isn't as clear cut as it may seem.

Cheers,
ortho_is_hot

Hi, on what basis is this bicycle=yes? Looks to me to only be wide enough for a person, and I haven't seen any signage to show that bicycles are allowed last time I visited.

Cheers,
ortho_is_hot

Hi there, for way/40256491 I'd suggest probably doing it as an additional tag for maxsped:conditonal=40 @ hgv

(got hgv from access=*#Transport_mode_restrictions)

Nice, looks good

I've reverted this in 90785886

Hi, what's the source for this change? Cheers, ortho_is_hot

I've added the access tagging back in 90780901