This looks like an unpaved road built mainly as an access route for service vehicles to access the water tank. Generally, either highway=service or highway=track would be appropriate here.

I can't find any evidence that horses are even allowed on UCSF's Mt Sutro property. Can you please provide some evidence that this is actually a bridleway, (or a path, or a tree row, or a footway..)?

This Parade Ground? https://www.nps.gov/places/000/alcatraz-parade-ground.htm

Sorry, but which branch of the military is using this decaying concrete surface in a National Park that's described as "...an excellent spot for a selfie...", "...host[ing] annual sunrise ceremonies which celebrate Native American culture..." and "...the trailhead for the Alcatraz Agave Trail and is open when the birds are not nesting..."?

Please familiarize yourself with the meaning of highway=pedestrian and area=yes before continuing to remove the tags from pedestrian plazas. Please take a look at highway=pedestrian#Squares_and_plazas

highway=pedestrian is entirely appropriate for this and similar features. It is a paved area, built for and traversal by people on foot.

I was willing to give you the benefit of the doubt, so I walked through here this weekend. Bostonship Plaza has not been turned into a grass park. There is no grass. Nothing has changed.

The two are not mutually exclusive. It's actually fairly common for pedestrian plazas to have some form of seating.

The seating area only occupies part of the plaza, btw, and is already mapped here: way/979811982

Rather than mapping Nike Road as tree-lined here, you turned the road itself into a tree row.

Can you explain what you were trying to do here? It's unclear what "...not suitable for usage to cross over" means or how it relates to a way being tree lined.

The Ferry Plaza is a pedestrian plaza. Please do not make edits like this.

In this edit you turned the entire road into a long gate, which is obviously not what you intended. If there's a gate somewhere along the road you need to add a node at the actual location, and put the relevant tags on that node.

(It also seems highly unlikely that this is closed, given that it's the only practical way up from the ferry landing for most...)

This is in fact a rooftop pedestrian area. It is not an area for shopping, nor for businesses to sell items.

Alcatraz Wharf is obviously not closed to pedestrians. What were you trying to fix here?

Is this a recent change? It still shows up as mostly concrete/asphalt in very recent aerial imagery.

Greenbrae is not a golf course. Please do not add fictional golf courses to OSM.

This is listed in the city's open data as Delmar Path (see https://data.cityofberkeley.info/dataset/Trail-map/r3zb-4nu7 for example), and you can see the existing right of way in the parcel data. It looks like the BPWA was raising money to build this path as recently as 2019 ( https://www.berkeleypaths.org/pathstories/2019/3/29/gofundme-campaign-for-terrace-view-paths ). I don't know the current status of these efforts, but it seems reasonable to have this tagged as a proposed way.

When sidewalks have been mapped as separate ways, as they have here, it's important to include all the crosswalks so that pedestrian routing can still work. Legally, there is an unmarked crosswalk here, and this is one of the places where people who need to cross Cedar St need to cross to avoid taking long detours. The kerb=raised, crossing=unmarked, wheelchair=limited tags should ideally cause routing software to prefer better crossing locations, if they exist.

It's also important where areas with separately mapped sidewalks (ie, with footway=sidewalk ) meet areas where the sidewalks have been mapped as tags on the main way (see sidewalk=* ), such as at this intersection, to include the connections at the end of the sidewalk ways.

Hi,
This address looks like a P.O. box. Does your company have an actual physical office somewhere that can be added to the map? Otherwise, this is likely to be removed.

This doesn't seem quite right. Colby doesn't directly intersect with Forest Street, but instead intersects with Claremont and requires crossing the northeast crosswalk to reach the main intersection. This edit places the crosswalk on the wrong side of Colby. It also obscures the fact that someone traveling north on Claremont would have to completely cross the intersection before turning left onto Colby. While the previous geometry wasn't a perfect representation either, it seems more accurate for this complex intersection.

Note: when you put the barrier=kerb tags right on the intersection between two perpendicular sidewalks (such as node/9811659110 for example) it implies that someone walking along the sidewalk and turning directly onto the other has to step off the curb. In reality they never encounter a curb at all unless actually crossing the street. It's generally better to map the curb a little bit away from the intersection, where the crosswalk crosses the actual curb.

https://www.ucsc.edu/about/address.html

I see a comma here?

I would be surprised if UCSC formatted their name differently from the other UC campuses, which follow the "University of California, [Place]" format.

Your company is not located in a big triangular building in the middle of Folsom Street. If it's a real company, with a actual physical office, please feel free to add it at it's actual location (without the ad copy please).

Hi,
The weight limit on Marin was already covered by the existing "maxweight=3 st" tag (note the units - these are not metric tons).