Where are you getting the data for the cycle routes from?

What is the reason for turning this from a track to a service road?

Hey, thanks for this. I will remember to add addr:city next time. Where do you get the data for addr:suburb from? As at least for Crookes they aren't in our actual post office addresses

Fixing what? These roads are not allowed to be driven one way by private motor vehicles. I have corrected the tags using non-oneway tagging to be clearer.

Your changes do not reflect the actual permissions of the road, I have fixed them

Please don't make up tags like access=psv

I think this may have been an accident?

Is it oneway for bikes too?

Seeing as this is part of unwrapped, I have moved the tag to the unwrapped node as `drinking_water:refill=yes`, see drinking_water:refill=*

Bicycles are also allowed to make this turn. Is this shown on tom tom ground level imagery and if so how come it wasn't added with this change too?

Was this a temporary change? Because I checked today and this is definitely oneway. It's only not oneway for bicycles

What is the source for cyclist not being allowed on the A96?

Example: how would a cyclist cross over from the A98 to Fochabers? way/467625181

This is apparently a permissive bridleway, so why was horse and bicycle set to no?

I have reverted this change as it is out of date. It used to be a oneway, but now is no motor vehicles allowed.

Hi, is it still closed?

Many of these changes are not correct in relation to cycling. Please could you revert? I'm happy to talk them over if you want.

Apologies, wrong changeset

I'm sorry but these changes aren't correct, please could you revert?

Is Hounsfield Lane a cycleway? way/120475060

Last I looked (a couple months ago) it was a normal road with cycle symbols painted on, which mean it should be highway=unclassified + cycleway=shared_lane.

Hi, this changeset changed this way accidentally from residential to brownfield landuse way/120475060. I have reverted this particular change.