OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
129236167

Hi, you have mapped a small section of unclassified road off Bagnall Street which appears to not align well with satellite imagery and also appears to be a private driveway and would be better tagged as highway=service plus service=driveway

129116512

Thanks for fixing so soon.

129116512

Hi
why have you deleted the section of McKenna St that joins Moreillon Boulevard?
You have also deleted all paths in Bannockburn Bushland Reserve.
All these are still evident on satellite imagery.
What Garmin map problem are you trying to solve by deleting these features?

128998964

This po box has been relocated to the right place now by the original mapper.
changeset/120928109

120928109

You offer excellent after hours service 😀

120928109

Hi
Do you know where this po box should be?
node/9737339619/history

128998964

Sorry… misposted 🫤

128998964

Hi
Do you know where this po box should be located?
node/9737339619/history

128813706

Hi, reverted now as I expect these are inadvertent additions to the public map

128830018

I remapped and tagged... feel free to change.

128830018

Hi
You seem to have duplicated your edit with 2 lots of address details on the building and another one at the end of the road.
Would you like me to try to resolve it by just mapping the business to the building you operate from by merging all this info to the building? I’ll map the building outline too as a bonus.

128459294

The routing sites take a while to update their routing databases and apps may be longer with some only updating with a new version of the app.
There are a few unnecessary duplicate addresses on Carter St.
You can have the address on a node and this is usual if the addresses are being added though an import or if the buildings haven’t been mapped yet but it is preferred to add to the building or a separate node but not both.
If you prefer you could add access=private to your driveway I mapped and that should stop the routers at the stub of the street once they are updated.

128459294

osm.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_car&route=-37.79034%2C144.81722%3B-37.78650%2C144.81618#map=16/-37.7896/144.8169

128459294

Thanks. You don’t need to add duplicate address tagging to the roadway node or the adjacent tag near the property boundary. Osm usual practice is to just add the address details to the residential building and routing apps will work well with that.

128813706

Hi, the appartments tags would better be added to the mapped buildings instead of adding a new node. The campsite and the atm you added look to be mistakenly added as they are within the roadway areas.

128761294

Hi
Osmi picks up a couple of your errors
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=153.42322&lat=-27.97358&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

128589177

fixed

128573855

fixed

128599738

Hi, you are expected to map the shape of the water body not just accept random shapes a computer has generated. The end result before upload should follow the outline of the water body.

128573855

Hi, there appears to be relation problems here.
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=152.95975&lat=-27.51679&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways