OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
170676710

Hi, osmi found the mp seems to be missing bits in the far se and looks like there is an inner missing its outer
relation/7148585#map=14/-42.86813/147.65123

170817382

Hi Janki, I reverted this changeset as adding a relation to the street for a sales office is an incorrect method. Instead, you should add a new point or node at the sales office building or draw the outline of that building and add your tags to that. There is no need to add all the superfluous tags to Propeller Ave.

170762731

I expect the housenumber should be a number in the 400’s

170806019

Hi, 20 and 22 Falconer Street building should be drawn as two separate houses

170762731

Looking more into the street numbering on Pitt St on various maps, I am totally perplexed by the numbering system.
You may have it all correct.

170762731

Hi, you have added addr:housenummber=63 but this business is not placed at 63 Pitt Street, Sydney on the map.
I note the housenumber and unit number are both 63. Is your business on the ground floor or on another level. Your website has no address details…only a phone number.
Do you have a physical business site where customers can attend. This would be the best position to locate your business on the map.

170755535

Hi, you accidentally dragged 8 Stocks Road node from its correct location.

170753605

Hi, the tree row is not present in satellite image and the footway appears incorrect.

170753536

Hi, the building draw at 7-9 Wadham Parade is actually two separate houses

170701947

Hi, the two buildings addressed relations should be redone as simple polygons with out the join

170701905

Hi John, can you delete the name Buuilding from one of these.

170701782

Hi, the imagery appears out of date for address 492. If you check Esri imagery you will see two new buildings…units 1 & 2.
It is always best practice to check both Bing and Esri as Esri is often more recent.

170701956

Hi, there are two buildings at 316 and both are addressed as unit 1.
I expect that one should be unit 2

170697618

Hi, this polygon appears to only cover part of the building footprint.

170697542

Hi, could you check if node/12419093565#map=19/-37.875809/145.133717 should be moved to the right where there is a building with no address. I think this node might have been accidentally shifted.

170679875

correction... the max and min age tags are correct

170677130

You have duplicated the same number under phone and mobile

170693371

You have duplicated the phone number with the same number under phone= and mobile=
Looks like a phone number.

170679875

Hi, you have duplicated the same phone number under the phone= and osm.wiki/Tag:mobile=.
It looks like a phone number.
You have used min and a max age tags but both are the same age. This appears unlikely.

170506845

way/975288222#map=16/-33.85097/151.28450