Hi, what is the source for this name?

Reverted now, feel free to edit area again.

Reverted now, feel free to edit in the area again.

Hi Ben, I think I will revert this tomorrow as osmi still picks up various problems.
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=153.53322&lat=-27.42522&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

Ok, thanks. Accidentally shifting nodes is easily done in the iD editor.
I’ll revert it tomorrow.

Hi, are you able to try fixing this?
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=130096138
..or would you rather I revert it?

Thanks for clearing that up Nigel. Since sending my comment I have been more diligent and and looked at it in more detail. I am pleased to see it is reverting to a more natural state with time gradually healing the scar. As a result of the bushfire I suppose there is not much point in mapping the area as natural=wood until the area recovers.

This JESUS LIVES nonsense is just vandalism. Just map the actual individual trees if you must subject the OSM to this.

Hi Ben, did you mean to change the coastline near Cylinder Beach. Coastlines should follow the mean high water mark.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=130014270&zoom=17&lat=-27.42509&lon=153.53184&layers=B0TTTFT
Part of the Moreton Bay Marine Park is changed too.
If this was accidental, would it be easiest to revert the change and then you can add you intended changes again.

osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

Hi
private mining company tracks should not be deleted. You should add access tags instead. Maybe access=private is most suitable.
access=*
Any gates on the tracks also also need mapping.

Esri seems to be the most recent imagery.
I agree with Warin61 that it would be best to just map the buildings here and maybe leave the roads unmapped until a local survey or later satellite data becomes available.

Hi
the building tag is used to map the building footprint and not the block of land around the house. Also the natural=wood area was deleted but appears to be still there by satellite imagery. Please try to improve the map.

I find it difficult to see how you managed to map the items in your changesets to a state that is not evidenced by the satellite imagery. You are expected to zoom in very close and align the things you map to what you can see in the clearest or latest imagery.

Hi, I am unable to see a building of any kind on any available satellite imagery where you have mapped one. Am I mistaken or is it a new building you have surveyed in person?

Hi this changeset has also been reverted due to damage by new mapper around HMAS Albatross

Thanks for the quick reply.
This the normal use of a water catchment area
relation/5913976#map=13/-33.1707/151.1539
I expect the area you are mapping would be better mapped as a multipolygon with the outer boundary of the natural=wood and an inner ring marking the water area. The waterway that links the pond to the lager water area across Hume Road could also be mapped, probably the same as where the waterway goes under Sunshine Road. A bit of wetland swamp might be another area defined between the two.

This is a bit complex to map and probably needs to be done locally as it is hard to define on satellite imagery alone but I might try remapping the area in the future.
I'll leave it to you for now, cheers.

This looks like a wooded area instead of a pond to me. What are you trying to add?

Hi
the roads in to private properties are not tagged with highway=residential...they need to be changed to highway=service plus service=driveway
Do you want me to do it or are you able to do those for both your user names?

Hi
Species or taxon is the correct tag for trees instead of giving each a name.
natural=tree

Please don't use name in this manner.
osm.wiki/Names