nevw's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 129236167 | Hi, you have mapped a small section of unclassified road off Bagnall Street which appears to not align well with satellite imagery and also appears to be a private driveway and would be better tagged as highway=service plus service=driveway |
|
| 129116512 | Thanks for fixing so soon. |
|
| 129116512 | Hi
|
|
| 128998964 | This po box has been relocated to the right place now by the original mapper.
|
|
| 120928109 | You offer excellent after hours service 😀 |
|
| 120928109 | Hi
|
|
| 128998964 | Sorry… misposted 🫤 |
|
| 128998964 | Hi
|
|
| 128813706 | Hi, reverted now as I expect these are inadvertent additions to the public map |
|
| 128830018 | I remapped and tagged... feel free to change. |
|
| 128830018 | Hi
|
|
| 128459294 | The routing sites take a while to update their routing databases and apps may be longer with some only updating with a new version of the app.
|
|
| 128459294 | ||
| 128459294 | Thanks. You don’t need to add duplicate address tagging to the roadway node or the adjacent tag near the property boundary. Osm usual practice is to just add the address details to the residential building and routing apps will work well with that. |
|
| 128813706 | Hi, the appartments tags would better be added to the mapped buildings instead of adding a new node. The campsite and the atm you added look to be mistakenly added as they are within the roadway areas. |
|
| 128761294 | ||
| 128589177 | fixed |
|
| 128573855 | fixed |
|
| 128599738 | Hi, you are expected to map the shape of the water body not just accept random shapes a computer has generated. The end result before upload should follow the outline of the water body. |
|
| 128573855 |