I have re-mapped many of the islands to Esri imagery and used that for the IPA boundaries. A few were left alone as differences were not so bad.
I have deleted the fixme from the Dhimurru Indigenous Protected Area relation.

There is no satellite imagery showing the new roads and the osm.wiki/Australian_data_catalogue#Western_Australia shapefiles don't have the data. As you are working there, I won't revert the changeset as your local knowledge can be a source you can use to map the streets and verify the names are correct. In the future satellite imagery will depict the streets and they can be aligned with that or someone can use their gps to record and upload traces for the OSM.
Thanks for your prompt reply.

Let me know if you have explicit permission to use Landgate as a source for adding this data to the OSM. If Not, this changeset will need to be reverted.

Hi
Landgate is not a permitted source for adding data to the OSM.
See the Australian Data Catalogue for permitted sources
osm.wiki/Australian_data_catalogue

Hi
There is a tag barrier=fence instead of using a description for the fence. You should also add a barrier=gate tag at the entrance

Ok.
The osm and other maps I have seen all show Goonyella Rd starts in the Moranbah township and goes out to the northwest and the road past the airport is Moranbah Access Rd. If that is incorrect and the road to or past the airport is signed Goonyella Road can you correct it thanks.

Hi
why is addr:street=Goonyella Road but the street running past Moranbah Apt is named Moranbah Access Road?

Thanks
I reported to the DWG as all the edits here, including some under a different name are spurious.

Hi
I think the wiki is quite specific in that you should be using multipolygons instead of boundary relations for such natural areas.
As you seem to disagree with this premise I think you should raise the issue on the talk mailing list so that it can be discussed and sorted out. There maybe no consensus on the issue I expect, but it is worth having discussing due to the large amount of mapping you are doing and the fact that others predominantly map differently.
I don’t know how rendering or other processing is affected but it may be I guess.
It is certainly an interesting topic to discuss with the community.

Hi
I think razed is the term used in osm instead of raised.
razed=*:

Hi
all this seems like fantasy mapping.
I am not local to the area but none of it seems to resemble the real situation in the area from imagery that I can access.
Do you realise this is a real world map?
Would you time be better spent editing this fantasy map?
https://opengeofiction.net/#map=3/29.69/72.77&layers=B
Should I revert all your mapping to restore the area to how it is in real life or has this area been completely rebuilt into something new and unexpected and your mapping reflects the current situation?

Hi
I removed some tags from the outer way and added them to the wood mp relation instead. area=yes is not required

Further info...see tagging areas...
osm.wiki/Editing_Standards_and_Conventions

Hi
Please do not connect the scrub areas to the road network. It is incorrect to join the scrub to the roadway centreline. The natural areas like this end at the side of the road. The wiki has advice on mapping such areas correctly.

Hi
please don't connect land uses, etc to the road centre lines. It is best practice to leave the road network separate.

Thanks for fixing this Warin.
Nevw

relation/13603738

Hi BushTel
I have added the Dhimurru Indigenous Protected Area sea country.
osm.wiki/Import/Catalogue/Australian_Dedicated_Indigenous_Protected_Areas_2020
Do you wish to amend the fixme tags regards this or should I delete them?

More complete reference
osm.wiki/Sidewalks
footway=sidewalk used on the trunk road South Road seems incorrect as it to be used on separately mapped footways or paths.

sidewalk=left|right|both is the correct method if tags are added to the trunk road and the footways are not yet mapped separately.

Hi
another mapper seems to have accidentally reverted your correction.
I have sent him a message and I also now feel that the sidewalk tag may be better.
Even better would be to map them separately as footways I guess but I'll leave that judgement to local mappers.

changeset/115041496#map=13/-34.9757/138.5618