For the edit inside the Hennepin County government center, did you mean to turn that into a long, looping escalator? (conveying=yes) I haven't been there, but I'm guessing it's multiple, separated escalators or something like that

Hi, thanks for adding to the map! One thing I noticed is that you're sometimes "gluing" areas to adjacent road ways. It's suggested to not do that and leave a gap for a variety of reasons, such as that it's not that accurate, and makes future editing more difficult. (see osm.wiki/Editing_Standards_and_Conventions#Areas_and_Ways_Sharing_Nodes) I get how it might seem "right" at first, though! Happy mapping!

Welcome to OSM and thanks for adding to the map! One thing I noticed is that you're sometimes "gluing" areas to adjacent road ways. It's suggested to not do that and leave a gap for a variety of reasons. (see osm.wiki/Editing_Standards_and_Conventions#Areas_and_Ways_Sharing_Nodes) Also, it's very helpful if you can somewhat differentiate your changeset descriptions--maybe what road you were editing near or town the edit is in? Just some suggestions from experience. Anyway, happy mapping!

Thanks for adding to the map! I'd suggest you look at the wiki page house=terraced. house=terraced should be used if you're tracing each townhome unit separately. building=terrace would be used for the whole building if you're not getting that detailed. If you're going the latter route, it might make sense to use a point to tag each address where the entrance is. Hope this helps, happy mapping!

Thanks for putting in so much work adding to the map. A couple requests to improve your contributions: 1) can you add more descriptive changeset comments? 2) if you're adding a lot of landuse to an area, can you make some effort to have the edges match? You're creating a bunch of gaps and slivers that could be easily avoided with a little care. For example, look at the farmland between Honey Creek and County Hwy HK. Thanks and happy mapping!

Hi, I'm curious how you're going about creating some of this land use? For example way/1343061183 is natural=wood, but in all of the imagery (including those noted as used in the changeset) about half of the area you've traced is actually field. I've seen this in some of your other changesets as well. Do you have some older custom sources you're using, for example?

I noticed this edit. Looks like it's echoing a huge discussion on the Storrs wikipedia talk page.

Hi, was wondering if you can avoid gluing the former railway lines to actual features? I've seen examples where you share these nodes with buildings, landuses, roads, etc. which just creates more work for anyone who's editing actual features later. Also, from imagery I'm not sure if all of these are best tagged "abandoned" -- it appears "razed" would be better at least for some. The wiki says abandoned should be "where the rails have been removed but the route is still visible with ties/sleepers, signals or other railroad right of way signs or infrastructure".

There is also a section from Clayton to Clear Lake - looks like it's now called the Sawmill Trail https://thestcroixvalley.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/ParksDeptSawmillCountyTrail.pdf

hoping this involved samples! :)

Hi, thanks for contributing to OSM. I noticed a bunch of duplicate nodes appeared in MN and many seem to have come from this changeset because the warnings were not resolved before uploading. Please try to resolve warnings in the future, and it'd be great if you could fix these--see OSM Inspector https://tinyurl.com/bdzjf2td Happy mapping!

Hi, since you're editing this area, do you know if this construction was completed as planned yet? (The construction landuse is still there) I can see the new buildings in-process when slightly zoomed out on the ESRI World Imagery layer (not the Clarity Beta) and it basically aligns with your paths. Happy mapping!

That checks out with the county's online map. https://gis.hennepin.us/Property?C=477179.941168682,4989205.14278779&L=8&T=aerial&IMG=&ANNO=false&FID=0111821310148&VIS=

Hi, I noticed some large ways in this changeset that are untagged, north of Aniwa Lane. Maybe you were trying to create an area of some kind but didn't finish? If you'd be able to add tags or delete, that'd be great. Happy mapping!

Welcome to OpenStreetMap! The tags you've used on this railway make it appear as if it currently exists. You should tag it as proposed (ie railway=proposed) to be more accurate, otherwise it is likely to be deleted. Even with that tag, given it is a very long range proposal, you may want to check with others about the best ways to handle this, for example on the OSM US Slack. More info specific to railway tagging is on the wiki: osm.wiki/Railways Happy mapping!

I'd say adding disused is definitely one solution. Given these bus stops were originally imported 14 years ago (changeset/3740505) there have been and will continue to be changes, so it also seems OK to delete, especially if the sign is gone and route changed. When the sign is still there, but another sign added that the bus no longer stops there, disused probably makes the most sense. Happy mapping!

Hi, thanks for adding to OpenStreetMap! I noticed in OSM Inspector that your edits created some self-intersections. https://tinyurl.com/bp5kvzx4 If you edit in this area using iD, and click on these ways it should highlight the issues. Could you take a look and try to resolve? Happy mapping!

Hi, thanks for working on this golf course! Please look through the common pitfalls in golf course mapping--you seem to be doing some of them, especially adding tags as names. leisure=golf_course#Common_mapping_pitfalls Happy mapping!

This looks like a botched edit. I can't think of a valid reason to add addr tags to *every node* in this changeset.

Welcome to OpenStreetMap! Imagery does not show a hospital here. Do you have some local knowledge that it was built recently? If not, please remove it--OSM is for verifiable data only. Happy mapping!