Please don't duplicate existing data - in an incorrect location

Is planning data licenced appropriately so it can be used for OSM?

Thisi is just a sympathetic cleanup of Changesets 42119601 and 42124023 -- which added a new industrial area and an untagged way that was roughly the same size atop the original larger industrial area. As it happens I've done some mapping here -- by no means is it a recycling facility -- more a compNY vehicle compound or similar.

Wow you've viisited a lot of pubs. Not convinced about this change tho' it's definitely "The Pot At Wot" on the pub sign.

Well, it's being redeveloped so will need resurveying soon. P.S. I use JOSM, so it remembers a last set of changeset comments -- but a simple text file and copy/paste would do the same for other editors -- a pain the first time, but not for subsequent edits.

Had to tweak it a tad -- both lanes were bus only.

Are you sure this is correct? Buses on separated bus lane can no longer enter the roundabout. A changeset comment would be good too. Thanks.

Are you sure this is correct? I thought that the whole point was that cyclists don't need to enter the roundabout -- check it out on Bing. A "Fixing roundabouts" changeset comment would've been really useful too. Cheers.

Are you sure that the preschool really takes up all that area?

I'm more upset that my wikipedia link insn't on the new location :-(

/the data source you're using isn't great I can see houses joined together that should be separate and separate buildings that should be joined together. You'll get better results tracing from Bing.

Hi Matt, rejigged your edit -- addresses won't get rendered visibly -- hope it's reasonable, if not let me know, or give it a tweak.

Layer -1?

Is it really disused -- are the rails visible?

I'm sure you're keen for feedback:

The school (building) was already mapped and named -- this wasn't "fixed".leading to duplication?

There was no need for the school area to be a multipolygon

The school multipolygon was inaccurate and overlapped theresidential multipolygon and would have been better to avoid that.

On the plus side, I've ended up guessing the boundary between the junior and infant school.

Why did you mark the area as industrial -- it's being redeveloped which is why it was marked as construction, as a hint not to use aerial imagery to draw buildings.

Have redrawn junction after making a lot of notes onsite -- some items were duplicated and some (especially "U-turn lanes" were missing).

This looks like a duplicate, albeit with different postcode and minor differences.
Maps.me won't show until a new data download becomes available -- osm.wiki/Maps.Me/Questionable_OSM_Edits

I've added back the footpath you deleted -- no worries.

FYI the moved node is: node/1003112566#map=18/51.45025/-2.52039 -- I'll move it back based on Bing if that's ok.

I think you meant addr:housename not addr:housenumber and Depot not Depo?