Well spotted. I have no reason not to assume it's my typo.

There shouldn't be overlaping ways for the same item - just add "bicycle=yes" to the existing parking lane.

"access=no" means no one can legally access this service road -- which seems odd. Maybe "service=private" was intended?

It seems odd to have a cycleway with "bicycle=no" did you survey this?

I've corrected a long node drag from this changeset -- seems like it might not be the only one.

This looks like a bmx-style racetrack, rather than a track for agricultural vehicles -- did you survey this?

There's no one-way markings visible on satellite imagery, given tree cover. Bing shows it as a cul-de-sac from A366 (necessarily two-way) https://www.bing.com/maps?osid=f70f66a5-0f98-4376-b48c-bcb9533cd932&cp=51.314973~-2.299937&lvl=19&dir=302.45245&pi=-6.536615&style=x&mo=z.0&v=2&sV=2&form=S00027 Mapillary also shows it as a dead end from A366.

From A36 Mapillary shows it as 2-way, as does Bing Streetside https://www.bing.com/maps?osid=7a4e5f6a-6c92-4d49-afba-6db7519997ad&cp=51.318157~-2.309885&lvl=19&dir=137.589&pi=-8.623945&style=x&mo=om.1~z.0&v=2&sV=2&form=S00027

This looks like a duplicate of the parking aisle.

A descriptive change set comment helps other mappers especially with ones covering a large area. What did you change?

A descriptive changeset comment helps other local mappers - what did you change?

You’ve removed amenity=hospital so it won’t be considered as a hospital now

Not really a good reason to delete it, just because its private (add access=private) -- but it was definitely a bit rubbish as was -- so have had another go :-)

I don't think many routing apps would notice a wall drawn like that -- might have to break the way and have a real gap, well unless there's a gate or something in the wall.

Seems odd -- it's inside CM3 ?

Some of the landuse seems to overlap other landuse which is unusual -- plus the grass going through the bingo building looks odd?

FYI you modified an admin boundary when you added scrubland - probably best to avoid. Some of the scrub looks more like allotments.

Whole area is scheduled for housing in the near future.

FYI you modified an admin boundary by joining a forest to it -- probably best to avoid.

Looks more like a trampoline on Bing?

Really looks like trees on Bing?

Why have you removed the bus-only tagging https://www.mapillary.com/app/?focus=photo&pKey=DZ6C024e0nUGfdPEEkLuBL&lat=51.499329982373396&lng=-2.4796254560374464&z=17&x=0.4861360520140399&y=0.6484835871922798&zoom=0