ndm's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 81402805 | I've reverted this -- please don't glue unrelated items such as highways and landuses items together it makes editting much more difficult. |
|
| 81421392 | Don't believe that Driveway or "foot path" are their real names -- best not to invent them. |
|
| 81379126 | Please add back all the footways and cycleways -- they were carefully surveyed. |
|
| 81318036 | Needs a proper survey. Mapillary is from Feb 4th so it's newer -- and obviosuly has a copyright that is compatible with OSM, rather than the Highways Agency photo. Possible footpath might come out at: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=51.54172013435701&lng=-2.6328473485604604&z=17&pKey=LJOi-8YeiRxQmGT0wBGN8A&focus=photo&x=0.5080508187494617&y=0.5402772628314706&zoom=0 |
|
| 81318036 | Scrub that -- forgot cyclepath is separated. |
|
| 81318036 | There's no reason cyclists can't use the roundabout --- access=no seems a bit harsh |
|
| 81318036 | There was still a connection to farm lane two weeks ago -- even if it was subject to construction/barriers https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=51.54277175163148&lng=-2.6352815071017273&z=17&pKey=k-QaQtALdsyqoOecllSK5A&focus=photo&x=0.5062408917637296&y=0.5099147984565611&zoom=0.00021216568154376267 |
|
| 80803209 | Reverted problematic edits |
|
| 80803325 | Reverted problematic edits. |
|
| 80803418 | Reverted problematic edits. |
|
| 80664025 | Fixed the easy gap. Don't know about the one near Amazon -- deleted the "temporary path (construction works), not visible on Bing" -- which is no longer there, see https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/1lJw5srlLPaou8K4IqvFIQ Can't help much more -- it's right on the limit for a lunchtime wander |
|
| 80803209 | A lot of the map is drawn from different imagery -- some of it is no longer available -- all has varying quality and offsets and parallax issues. Some mappers draw "to the roofs" -- some to the ground -- if there's no parallax there's no difference -- but can be significant if parallax is present. If you're looking at an area that's already been mapped then aligning imagery to what's already present (maybe multiple times) can reduce the number of changes. If you're determined to move stuff then consider all connected items -- just moving a subset can cause problems. See how it's rendered after the changes. Fix it if you break it -- or undo it -- or ask for help. |
|
| 80803418 | Rest is probably ok. |
|
| 80803418 | way/471983747 -- probably not a square building -- doesn't match ESRI clarity |
|
| 80803418 | There's a bad drag of way/496196928 -- don't think alll the nodes got moved -- original probably nearer ground truth, paralax in imagery. |
|
| 80803325 | Other changes look harmless / useful cleanup. |
|
| 80803325 | way/625567210#map=19/51.46729/-2.57694 no longer matches ESRI clarity |
|
| 80803325 | way/564470886#map=19/51.46989/-2.58089 no longer has a smooth wall/street |
|
| 80803325 | way/668771054#map=19/51.46700/-2.58378 no longer has a smooth wall/street |
|
| 80803325 | way/618601186#map=19/51.46612/-2.58457 no longer matches ESRI clarity |