ndm's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 77898143 | Congratulations on the move. I'd recommend keeping the name the same as that on the external signage.
If you want to describe a more legal owner, then maybe operator="formal company name" might be better. |
|
| 77898203 | Does this still have any signage for Niche Frames? Is it still a shop? Generally, local Bristol mappers have been leaving signed names on buildings and just marking them as disused:amenity / disused:shop / disused:office. The names have only been removed fro mthe map when the last signage has disappeared from the physical building. |
|
| 77898225 | Does this still have any signage for Ceres? Is it still a restaurant? Generally, local Bristol mappers have been leaving signed names on buildings and just marking them as disused:amenity / disused:shop / disused:office. The names have only been removed from the map when the last signage has disappeared from the physical building. |
|
| 77898243 | Does this still have any signage for Bristol Office Furniture? Is it still a shop? Are the contact detalis still relevant? Generally, local Bristol mappers have been leaving signed names on buildings and just marking them as disused:amenity / disused:shop / disused:office. The names have only been removed fro mthe map when the last signage has disappeared from the physical building. |
|
| 77898354 | Does this still have any signage for Seabright printers? Generally, local Bristol mappers have been leaving signed names on buildings and just marking them as disused:amenity / disused:shop / disused:office. The names have only been removed fro mthe map when the last signage has disappeared from the physical building. |
|
| 77898382 | Does this still have any signage for avon law centre? Is it still an office? Generally, local Bristol mappers have been leaving signed names on buildings and just marking them as disused:amenity / disused:shop / disused:office. The names have only been removed fro mthe map when the last signage has disappeared from the physical building. |
|
| 77701123 | Just be careful -- you can't copy other maps (without getting permission to add their data under ODbL to OpenStreetmap). |
|
| 77769948 | Thanks for checking - I always mark stores where I survey them, and follow the signed names.
|
|
| 77791445 | Has the building been demolished now? |
|
| 77701123 | I've added back the indoor corridors - please don't delete them again. |
|
| 77563410 | When you added it to the service road it got added to the footway too -- might have needed a bit more zoom next time :-) |
|
| 77715096 | This changeset seems to connect a service road to an administrative boundary -- I will try to fix it. |
|
| 77563410 | Ok, I've moved the gate so pedestrians can use the footway unimpeded. |
|
| 77563410 | At first glance - it looks like you've added the gate on the footpath which seems odd. |
|
| 77520721 | Looks to be pretty consistent with my approach, e.g. changeset/77471096#map=18/51.54013/-2.54355, so I'd be equally wrong if you are :-) I tend to use the building outline to naturally clip the road -- I suppose it adds a couple of extra nodes to the building, but no one's complained yet! |
|
| 77446539 | Looks like this should be Barton Hill Settlement from Bing? |
|
| 77363207 | One of the service roads is a footway -- I've fixed it. |
|
| 77115357 | I think you need to understand that you can cross a painted meridian to turn -- if you are careful https://www.highwaycodeuk.co.uk/lines-and-lane-markings-on-the-road.html# Please don't add any turn restrictions that conflict with the highway code. |
|
| 77115357 | I've reverted these turn restrictions -- there is no evidence on Bing Streetside. |
|
| 77069733 | You should also be following the https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines |