OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
68287064

Partially reverted the Oaktree Crescent and footpath nodes -- moved ~1 mile, see https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=68287064

68258853

I've added back the information you deleted in error.

68257925

Difficult to review big areas - I did notice you joined the footway at Temple Meads along the edge of the building. I can't work out if it's meant to be inside/outside :-)

Joining items along the same lines can make it hard to edit them individually later on.

68266738

I've redrawn these "ruins" from the satellite imagery. Large areas are more likely to be better tagged as landuse. Buildings should be smaller/more detailed.

68096969

roof:levels=10 seems wrong

68256881

Don't the signs on the buildings say "Filton sgs" ?

68255764

How are you determining building heights?

If you can't cite a suitable information source, then I will delete them all.

68142410

The address and other information is still missing please add it back - or I can easily roll the version back for you to yesterday.

68136085

JOSM validator flags building:part and building are the same

68139463

node/6337914862

68139463

Nodes shouldn't have a roof:shape.

68142410

Apologies Parkgate building.

68142410

Here's a link with all of the info way/17239182/history

68142410

You've deleted the Capricorn building - please add all the information back.

68136929

Try Esri clarity it's a lot sharper than Bing - as recommended on the Bristol section of the wiki. May have to pay with zoom.

68136592

Looks like a bad house number survey - there's more two 92 and three 90 - Dewfalls Drive which seems odd.

68098035

https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/images/6/62/Organised_Editing_Guidelines.pdf

68096910

https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/images/6/62/Organised_Editing_Guidelines.pdf

68098647

Looks like the roofs at ground level? https://demo.f4map.com/#lat=51.5472622&lon=-2.5945412&zoom=20&camera.theta=77.708&camera.phi=135.103

68096910

Still needs a proper comment "Adding building heights" would be something close to acceptable.

If it's metres you don't add m - only if not.

If you're mapping for commercial purposes as part of your job you need to show that on your Osm user page with contact email etc