The previous name was as surveyed -- Wikipedia is not the standard -- please revert this.

Note a quick search would have found https://www.flickr.com/photos/51321219@N02/9656442109/

No, they're only 20mph if signposted (30 mph roads don't have 30mph signs -- except on a boundary with a 20 mph one). The official ruling would be BCC traffic orders http://www.bristol.gov.uk/page/transport-and-streets/traffic-regulation-orders-tros but they probably don't have a good copyright to mix with OSM, so back to signposts it is :-)

My bad -- disregard the above

Was the postbox in the wrong place? http://robert.mathmos.net/osm/postboxes/2/map.html?lat=51.458869&lon=-2.619061&zoom=13 seemed to have it as a good match?

I had a feeling that the oneway didn't apply right at the Gloucester Road end? So the flats could get to their parking?

I think the grit bin's accidentally been "snapped" to the junction?

Not convinced this needs a name?

Not convinced that this needs a name?

There's a German post @Shmias/diary/34965 about a tree called Tree

Do these all have 20mph signs? I know a lot of cul-de-sacs don't.

Didn't have any signage visible from the road, but I guess its Gordano RFC not Gardano RFC?

Does OSM have permission to use the official OS map?

Is this the right name?

You should probably raise a bug with OsmAnd.

The scultpure's called Ursa -- I didn't mark it correctly when I added it -- will update.

Not sure this needs the footways -- the inside of the Bearpit is already marked as pedestrian?

What's a sculpure? If I remember it rightly it's a vertical windmill/generator

Were these surveyed? Do they need a source:name OS_Locator? Maybe a source Bing as well?

Good to see some North Bristol updates

I'd already added a swing gate on Highwood Lane where you added a gate so I merged them.

I was also a bit confused about having swing gates on the administrative boundary near the airfield -- does that make sense?

Ok, looks like Bing imagery has shifted since I sketched it -- I'll add the building tags and hopefully a few improvements :-)

Not entirely convinced this is a great improvement -- a lot has disappeared (missing "building=yes"). The "front-line" doesn't look very straight?