I don't think area on it's own will show much?

Interested in where you got open data from Bristol City Council on 20 mph limits with a good licence for OSM? Since this isn't from a survey, perhaps there should be a source:maxspeed tag as well?

This changeset looks strange and the pokemon comment suspicious - can someone local check?

The way you've tagged with "water" is part of a multipolygon relation which has an inside and an outside, see relation/1250536. The relation is marked as "dock" which is probably closer to a floating harbour than "just water".

I expect that this change will probably have to be reverted, along with changeset/45435219.

I'd recommend starting with smallish changes -- I still remember deleting half an A-road, luckily no one noticed :-)

I was finishing up an edit on this road -- and found a couple of relevant photos. Have updated the name.

Not a description - it is a prominent name in addition to logos/branding. I have added a note that the name needs to be (re)surveyed. Could you please add such notes in the future; unless you've directly surveyed it.

Slightly concerned as you need to be very careful not to add information from copyrighted maps in OpenStreetmap.

Slightly concerned as you need to be very careful not to add information from copyrighted maps in OpenStreetmap.

I thought it was mapped fairly well. I note it doesn't align with Bing -- and there's no way for motorbikes to turn into Emma-Chris way now -- which I'm pretty sure that they are allowed to. Did you survey this?

Not sure what "foot access" has to do with this change. It just seems to lose information about switching lanes. Bing imagery is out of date -- and I thought it was mapped fairly well. Did you survey this?

Great to see someone else adding stuff -- I tweaked your edit a tiny bit -- no point in calling a tree "Tree".

No worries, added back the tags.

It's usually better to remodel buildings by splitting them, rather than deleting and creating two new ones -- a number of tags on the Greggs (not Gregs) have been lost.

Are you sure about the changes to the junction near "The Cross Hands" -- especially which roads can turn to/from "Lawn Road". A quick check on Bing looks closer to the previous layout -- especially the now deleted traffic islands.

H M Prison (Bristol) is already mapped

Please don't duplicate existing data - in an incorrect location

Is planning data licenced appropriately so it can be used for OSM?

Thisi is just a sympathetic cleanup of Changesets 42119601 and 42124023 -- which added a new industrial area and an untagged way that was roughly the same size atop the original larger industrial area. As it happens I've done some mapping here -- by no means is it a recycling facility -- more a compNY vehicle compound or similar.

Wow you've viisited a lot of pubs. Not convinced about this change tho' it's definitely "The Pot At Wot" on the pub sign.

Well, it's being redeveloped so will need resurveying soon. P.S. I use JOSM, so it remembers a last set of changeset comments -- but a simple text file and copy/paste would do the same for other editors -- a pain the first time, but not for subsequent edits.