You need to change "access=private" at the gate not before -- the oriignal edit breaks cycle routing.

Redrawn to avoid changes to a boundary.

I removed the turn restrictions that are redundant due to "oneway=yes".

I left the no u-turns -- I assume that they are signed explciitly.

Redrawn - ways going through parking spaces

Bing Streetside shows this as a footway connecting to a pedestrian crossing.

Odd edit -- deleted node/4892375583/history in Brussels

Are you sure this is private -- it looks like a road to the church

Housename "Ground Floor" seems wrong.

The original data "The Orange Factory" was derived from external signage -- has this now been removed?

Removed service road that you added - needs ground survey following recent building work - please don't add it via AI.

This seems to be visible on Bing?

Bing Streetside shows about half a gate:
https://www.bing.com/maps?osid=d2f12912-b788-4606-8b36-5d394a7c2612&cp=51.527047~-2.676588&lvl=19&dir=304.03217&pi=-8.145277&style=x&mo=om.1~z.2.01&v=2&sV=2&form=S00027

Are there really 2 gates one within 20m?

This is just badly drawn -- parking aisles are straight you are adding unnecessary nodes which are giving them wierd angles.

Data like this is already available at https://osm.mathmos.net/postboxes/box-info/?ref=BA1+299 together with the injunction not to copy it directly, but to survey

So you've added third-party copyrighted data into OSM, just not in a ref tag.

Data like this is already available at https://osm.mathmos.net/postboxes/box-info/?ref=BA1+183 together with the injunction not to copy it directly, but to survey

So you've added third-party copyrighted data into OSM, just not in a ref tag.

What is the Open Data source of your apparently correct ref?

What is the Open Data source of your apparently correct ref?

In case you think I'm being grumpy -- this is almost exactly the same edit I told you about in changeset/88701831