It looks like you're importing Sustrans copyright information into OpenStreetMap -- do you have an appropriate licence to do this? Was this discussed on the imports / talk-gb mailing lists?

It looks like you're importing Sustrans copyright information into OpenStreetMap -- do you have an appropriate licence to do this? Was this discussed on the imports / talk-gb mailing lists?

It looks like you're importing Sustrans copyright information into OpenStreetMap -- do you have an appropriate licence to do this? Was this discussed on the imports / talk-gb mailing lists?

It looks like you're importing Sustrans copyright information into OpenStreetMap -- do you have an appropriate licence to do this? Was this discussed on the imports / talk-gb mailing lists?

It looks like you're importing Sustrans copyright information into OpenStreetMap -- do you have an appropriate licence to do this? Was this discussed on the imports / talk-gb mailing lists?

It looks like you're importing Sustrans copyright information into OpenStreetMap -- do you have an appropriate licence to do this? Was this discussed on the imports / talk-gb mailing lists?

It looks like you're importing Sustrans copyright information into OpenStreetMap -- do you have an appropriate licence to do this? Was this discussed on the imports / talk-gb mailing lists?

ESRI imagery seems to show the removed section clearly.
Maxar premium seems to have trees obscuring the path.
Irrespective there must be some access to garages/sheds at end of the gardens.

You have connected the service road to an administrative boundary -- perhaps you could zoom in more next time -- or even better use a filter to avoid changing boundaries if you are only adding service roads.

I'll try to fix it.

I reverted this -- doesn't seem to be present on Maxar imagery and it would be somewhat unusual to have a service road near to a bus stop.

Bing Streetside shows a kerb -- it's probably more of a footway -- so I've modified it.

Looks like parking areas have suffered from you moving nodes? I'll try and fix it.

Do you have a link for this turn restriction? More likely to be "straight ahead only" not "no right turn" surely?

It's already marked as 1 Cathedral Square.

A lot of Bristol suburbs have now been duplicated as peaks.

Can someone please revert - or I'll do so when I can

Congratulations on the move.

I'd recommend keeping the name the same as that on the external signage.
Obviously a shorter name is more likely to be displayed :-)

If you want to describe a more legal owner, then maybe operator="formal company name" might be better.

Does this still have any signage for Niche Frames? Is it still a shop?

Generally, local Bristol mappers have been leaving signed names on buildings and just marking them as disused:amenity / disused:shop / disused:office.

The names have only been removed fro mthe map when the last signage has disappeared from the physical building.

Does this still have any signage for Ceres? Is it still a restaurant?

Generally, local Bristol mappers have been leaving signed names on buildings and just marking them as disused:amenity / disused:shop / disused:office.

The names have only been removed from the map when the last signage has disappeared from the physical building.

Does this still have any signage for Bristol Office Furniture? Is it still a shop? Are the contact detalis still relevant?

Generally, local Bristol mappers have been leaving signed names on buildings and just marking them as disused:amenity / disused:shop / disused:office.

The names have only been removed fro mthe map when the last signage has disappeared from the physical building.

Does this still have any signage for Seabright printers?

Generally, local Bristol mappers have been leaving signed names on buildings and just marking them as disused:amenity / disused:shop / disused:office.

The names have only been removed fro mthe map when the last signage has disappeared from the physical building.