I'm not a fan of large changesets. When I looked with achavi there was a change that made a building detached that should be connected in Bristol - which wasn't reflected in the comment. If you're having trouble finding the issue in your change so will other mappers. Other changes might have been ok - but very hard to tell.

Do these blocks stop motor_vehicle only or foot and bicycle (horse) too?

The change in Bristol is wrong and doesn't match the changeset comment!

Maybe this should all be reverted -- validator is throwing up stuff that should be fixed locally (or at least in smaller changesets).

You deleted a way marked as a public footpath -- it seems to be on rowmaps -- seems like a bad idea?

Should at least be shared foot/cycle?

No it was deleting the way I wondered about -- I often use the presence of even inaccessible paths as useful routing info.

Demote to driveway based on Bing Streetside

All the residential roads are mapped -- demoted to driveway

Checked on Bing Streetside and demoted to service

Likely to change in a construction area?

Not a good idea to draw roads through buildings.

Demoted to service and driveway

Demoted to service

Demoted to service

Demoted one to service

Driveways - please check with Bing Streetside when adding.

Better to just add access no? Maybe demote to path?

Shame to lose the info - can double tag or add a poi inside the shop?

Has it shut? https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5735525/Bristol-video-shop-20th-Century-Flicks-UKs-smallest-cinema.html

It's a close call, but if it's residential many QA tools assume it should have a name -- so it should be signed?