ndm's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 69614284 | I removed all the mismatched ids - the auto-matching website doesn't work well with multiple values. I'll check on the FHRS site and add back any it recognises that I removed. |
|
| 69442998 | Cheers :-) |
|
| 69421831 | There's 3 number 91 houses now on Filton Avenue something seems to be wrong! |
|
| 68517621 | Has the chimney gone? https://binged.it/2HRls7T |
|
| 68517348 | If you think way/679288109 goes over "The Tunnels" etc. then it needs a "layer=1" or something like that. Also does it connect the normal pavement / cycle path. Cheers. |
|
| 68287064 | Partially reverted the Oaktree Crescent and footpath nodes -- moved ~1 mile, see https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=68287064 |
|
| 68258853 | I've added back the information you deleted in error. |
|
| 68257925 | Difficult to review big areas - I did notice you joined the footway at Temple Meads along the edge of the building. I can't work out if it's meant to be inside/outside :-) Joining items along the same lines can make it hard to edit them individually later on. |
|
| 68266738 | I've redrawn these "ruins" from the satellite imagery. Large areas are more likely to be better tagged as landuse. Buildings should be smaller/more detailed. |
|
| 68096969 | roof:levels=10 seems wrong |
|
| 68256881 | Don't the signs on the buildings say "Filton sgs" ? |
|
| 68255764 | How are you determining building heights? If you can't cite a suitable information source, then I will delete them all. |
|
| 68142410 | The address and other information is still missing please add it back - or I can easily roll the version back for you to yesterday. |
|
| 68136085 | JOSM validator flags building:part and building are the same |
|
| 68139463 | ||
| 68139463 | Nodes shouldn't have a roof:shape. |
|
| 68142410 | Apologies Parkgate building. |
|
| 68142410 | Here's a link with all of the info way/17239182/history |
|
| 68142410 | You've deleted the Capricorn building - please add all the information back. |
|
| 68136929 | Try Esri clarity it's a lot sharper than Bing - as recommended on the Bristol section of the wiki. May have to pay with zoom. |