Are you sure way/655566640 is a loop?

This seems odd - Bing streetside doesn't show Bishop Monk Avenue -- how did you get to see the barriers. Also imagery seems to be 6 years old -- there seem to be new houses and roads here on OSM not on Bing.

In bing the service road looks like it's drawn through parking spaces.

This is 2 adjacent driveways, not one service road.

I've added a note that this needs an on the ground survey

Bad idea to encourage motorists to use this junction it's bus only!

What's the source of this "correction"? Was it surveyed on the ground?

Going to tweak some of this -- parks are glued to paths that they shouldn't be -- and I assume the car park shouldn't go through the building?

Numbering looks a bit odd on Upton Road -- did you check it on foot?

Note: most buildings in Bristol are drawn using ESRI clarity -- unfortunately, in the last week or so, that's become a lot fainter with some different shifts. The original stuff was a lot clearer and more accurate -- so may be better to if buildings aren't aligned with your imagery to change the imagery offset in JOSM, rather than moving all the buildings.

wetland=tidalflat only seems to be defined for salt water - so fine for estuary, but not really for a river (or change the wiki)? Maybe add: tidal=yes, surface=mud too?

Geometry's great -- just need to find a better way of tagging the tidal river -- natural=wetland doesn't seem to be right. There's just mud in most of the river, no special wetland vegetation as seems to be required. Maybe the talk-GB or tagging lists will have some good ideas if you ask.

Bother -- tweked it to match 2012 Bing Streetside and old ESRI imagery - using original polygon (to keep the history). Might dig out my 2017 photos if I can find them to verify.

This has been reverted. There are no "no right turn" signs visible in Bing streetside -- contrary to the misleading changeset comment.

If you want to stop routing around the island you may need to fix your router to avoid sharp turns.

Bing streetside doesn't show any u-turn restrictions -- is there any reason this shouldn't be reverted?

You seem to have deleted a number of (possibly informal) paths - assuming not mapping from an an-foot survey can you please add them back.

You seem to have deleted a number of (possibly informal) paths - assuming not mapping from an an-foot survey can you please add them back.

I'll keep an eye on it -- sometimes rendering takes a while to catch up -- plus all browser caching too. Fingers crossed :-)

TBH if there is no path, then I wouldn't draw one.

Maybe have a look at the access page access=* -- probably has better explanations that I can do.

I notice you've joined the landuse (multipolygons) to the road(s) -- it's great in theory, but in practice just makes it harder to edit -- every time you adjust a road you end up changing the huge area that the relation covers, and that's more likely to conflict with other mappers.