You seem to have deleted a number of (possibly informal) paths - assuming not mapping from an an-foot survey can you please add them back.

You seem to have deleted a number of (possibly informal) paths - assuming not mapping from an an-foot survey can you please add them back.

I'll keep an eye on it -- sometimes rendering takes a while to catch up -- plus all browser caching too. Fingers crossed :-)

TBH if there is no path, then I wouldn't draw one.

Maybe have a look at the access page access=* -- probably has better explanations that I can do.

I notice you've joined the landuse (multipolygons) to the road(s) -- it's great in theory, but in practice just makes it harder to edit -- every time you adjust a road you end up changing the huge area that the relation covers, and that's more likely to conflict with other mappers.

It would be nice to be consistent with other sports grounds like RGS.

Cheers for adding details back.

FYI -- I tend to add building/address POIs where precise location was fuzzy, e.g. can see the housename in a photo, but can't directly locate it -- I'll try and remember to add a "fixme=approximate" in the future -- but there's probably still some old ones about.

Some of the housenumbers that were approximate POIs are now added to buildings -- did you survey them to check exactly where they should go?

I can see you've deleted some of the more detailed tracing like extensions and porches -- which is a shame as a lot of this was photo surveyed on foot. Just because you can't see the outline on satellite imagery doesn't mean it's not there -- it's often blurred / in shadow.

Just wondered if "access=private" is better than "foot=no" on way/646093568

If they are kissing gates they should be marked as barrier=kissing_gate -- it's important as gate might not be open for walkers whereas kissing gate by implication will be (and conversely for vehicles :-)

Not all objects show up on the "normal" map -- that's ok -- it's just an example. There are specialised versions of OSM maps that show more objects and types of paths for walkers, e.g. https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#?map=12!51.4628!-2.5724 or http://www.free-map.org.uk/

The position of the hot wells is supposedly near way/373705726 -- if I remember my guided walk correctly.

Not convinced on this -- it seems you've moved Hotwells somewhere between Cumberland Basin and Cliftonwood?

No worries.

It's still signed as Westpoint - at least tonight :-)

Well, realised it wasn't a separate building part, so demoted it to a POI within the co-op (exact position TBD).

As to the other building - looks like it's in an industrial estate from ESRI imagery -- maybe a Royal Mail factity perhaps, rather than a post office per se?

Reverting this one.

Pedestrian crossing is on the adjacent separated footpath as marked on the map.

True, but signage hasn't changed - please revert.

yep, only guided PSVs.

This has been reverted - these roads are not accessible to normal PSVs - see mapillary tracks, etc.