DId you try DigitalWorld Premium Imagery -- really clear for new buildings round here.

So, I picked this reply while I was in town and had a quick investigate -- I've made a first change on changeset/62357550

It's likely the area will need surveying in the near future due to "New Yard" development by http://www.cityandcountry.co.uk/development/the-general/properties-in-the-new-yard-bristol/12

I can see no evidence of a gate / private access signed from Guinea Road next to #14 - but it was dark.

Aerial imagery is likely out of date.

Surely highway=track is definitive: "This tag represents roads for mostly agricultural use, forest tracks etc.; usually unpaved (unsealed) but may apply to paved tracks as well, that are suitable for two-track vehicles, such as tractors or jeeps."

So you're going to change it?

Or maybe add a note for a local mapper to check?

Yes.

At the time it was added there was a general linear track with construction vehicles on it. Don't know what was being constructed -- needs a survey :-)

At the very least might need to think about changing the source:name tags? I guess the previous version is based on OS Locator (https://ris.dev.openstreetmap.org/oslmusicalchairs/map?osl_id=536651).

Aside: I wonder if Cabot Circus development broke streets up a bit -- like "Passage Road" near WoT and Cribbs -- where same street name is broken into discontinuous pieces? Or maybe it's just wrong -- I never found really good street signs for some of these.

I've removed the private tag from the graveyard.

Have the gates been surveyed or are they "assumed"?

Sent to osm-edit-escalations@amazon.com but no response.

Think most of this one needs reverting:

changeset/62102102#map=17/51.49793/-2.54306

Looks like this is drawn using out of date imagery through a "construction" area -- http://www.southwestbusiness.co.uk/sectors/construction-and-commercial-property/06102015172238-builder-taylor-wimpey-buys-land-near-uwe-bristol-for-550-new-homes

Sent to osm-edit-escalations@amazon.com but no response.

Well, quite a few boats are buildings -- so I don't see why a canopy can't be one :-)

Good to clear up where schools really are -- signage was pretty useless.

Someone's deleted the "tent" bit!

You removed the fixme=approximate on the schools -- they were there as it wasn't clear which part of the whole was each school.

Nope definitely a drive, surveyed it on foot today.

I think this one needs reverting - you've deleted the parking that was surveyed on foot and dragged a building to an odd shape.

Is this a track?

DigitalGlobe Standard Imagery has the roads - might need to align the imagery first tho'

Is this residential or service?

Is this a driveway?

Folly Brook looks ok now thanks.

FYI: JOSM has a filter window if you don't want to edit stuff like waterways or boundaries.

You seem to have dragged a stream about -- any chance you can do a partial revert?

https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=62016248

Glad it helped -- great to see some buildings in the gaps :-)

Have you tried the ESRI clarity layer -- it's got a lot better detail in Bristol -- not as up to date in areas with new builds tho'. Note this was the old Bing layer so a lot of stuff's already been added with that imagery offset.

Looks like the whole of Corsham is now a church -- I think you tagged the wrong way -- easily done.