Is this tagging valid, May I know the next actions on this Commodoortje

Hi Soumabha,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap (OSM). Noticed that you have added parks over existing parks and also some non tagged features. Could you please correct those edits and make map look clean. OSM is considered as real map of the world.

Let me know if you need anything regarding mapping.

Best Regards,
nammala

Hi tnt713tnt,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap (OSM). Noticed that you have been adding random parkas and waterbodies which is not appropriate. OSM is the real map of the world and the data we add should be ground truth not fictional. Please make sure you add valuable data to the map.

Regards,
nammala

Hi,

May I know the reason behind adding park which already exists like park inside park .
Could you please correct the edits .

Regards,
nammala

Please make using appropriate tags , tagging building and landuse to the highway is not appropriate . Please make sure you correct the changes

It is not appropriate to tag both `landuse` and highway` , it is recommended to use highway tag only . Please make sure you correct the edit

In case of waterway, it is better to have single tag like waterway , landuse tag is not needed

Hi Mdk99,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap (OSM). Noticed that you have been adding multiple tags to one way like `leisure` & `landuse` tags which is not a good practice. Make sure you add only one tag which makes sense and the rest you can add in description tag if needed. Please correct the edits.
Let me know if you need anything regarding mapping.

Best Regards,
nammala

Hi jerryhappy,

Could you please confirm the node of the city which was also named as city. node/4852900893

Hi OGblazemaster,

Noticed that you have added park tag to the building which is not the right way. I am bringing back the building tag. Please make sure you add valuable data not fictional data.

Best Regards,
nammala

Hi Nidzz,

Thanks for contributing to OSM. Could you please confirm the parks which you have added , Cannot see in the imagery.

Hi peter piper,

The tree can be tagged as natural tree instead of park . Could you please make those changes.

Hi theradi93,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap (OSM). OSM is the real map of the world and the data we add should be ground truth. Noticed that you added `leisure=natural reserve` is too big and also not matching to the imagery . Could you please confirm the edit you have made.
Let me know if you need anything regarding mapping.

Best Regards.
nammala

Hi Quivorir,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap(OSM). Noticed that you have added leisure=park over residential area which is not a good practice. OSM is the real map of the world make sure you add data which is ground truth.

Best Regards,
nammala

Make sure you give correct names to the features not random names. OSM is the real world of the map and the data should be ground truth

Hi Kias1,

Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap (OSM). Could you please confirm the park you have added and also the park should be way and the node of the park can be merged with the way.

Best Regards,
nammala

Could you please change from area=yes to `landuse=residential`.

Thanks vMoppy for getting back. Please be cautious in editing next time and let me know if you need anything regarding mapping.

Happy Mapping

Best Regards,
nammala

Hi Peng-Chung

Could you please mention the Imagery source of adding this data

Regards,
nammala

Thanks eggie for taking care of this