Hey there. your changes are quite extensive. Appreciate the extra station details, but it seems like you didnt consider the existing parts of the station that were already mapped (station entrances were disrupted, existing station footprint ignored etc). Care to explain your source and mapping process?

Oh I was actually talking about these ones. I was there today and there is a fence blocking any access. So you probably should delete those especially if it was found only on gmaps.
way/1158893894
way/1158893895

Hi. I'm not sure if adding that path to connect the cycle lane to the service road is the right way to map. It would be misleading to say that there is a path when you have to carry your bicycle up.

Ohh sorry I was not aware it already exists. Will update the existing relation. And I dont think it's a proper loop. i didnt enter the Hab as well.
Also I believe the starting and end point in KL is at KLCC(Opp). The bus didnt really stop long at Lebuh Ampang

Hi Aina thanks for the correction! You got it right there. I overlooked changing the tags when I was adding nodes.

Thanks for the update Aina. I have verified myself that there are indeed poles that have labels JDSS. However based on the history of the location and the road I'm not sure we can conclusively conclude the name of the road using that. Best way is probably to ask the locals who live there.

Hi Aina, can you verify the source of the name of Jalan Dewan Sultan Sulaiman 1. I've not seen that road named as such anywhere on that particular highway.

Any reason that there are two polygons on top of each other for the Old High Court building?

I just checked, you're right. The tracks seem very funky and it follows Esri (clarity) imagery. Will correct it when i'm free

thanks for the heads up. i'll double check when i'm in the area.

thanks. so the roundabout part in that proposal video has already been built?

Hi there. The changes to the intersection at Jalan Tambun and Jalan Tambun Lama are quite significant. Specifically the direction of the roads and you adding the roundabout. Can you share the source?

Did you visit Kampung Baru Batu 11? I was there a few days ago to map a bit. Got spooked by locals asking what I was doing then was told that the area is dangerous. Happened at Jalan 4.

Alright I agree. with your suggestions. Will merge the busstop data for routes I'm working on.
However should we split the bus stop name into name and ref tags?
For example name=SL182 PANGSAPURI KENANGA
should be split to
name=Pangsapuri Kenanga
ref =SL182

I'm not an editor on Moovit. But yeah would be good to update there too.

Btw I notice you just did a mass import of bus route data. You got it from here correct :https://www.data.gov.my/data/ms_MY/dataset/senarai-lokasi-stesen-bas-rapid-kuala-lumpur-kl

Some of the stops you added overlap existing bus stops. I noticed this while i was reviewing the 170 route bus stops. I'll remove the redundant new ones ok?

-Yaa exactly, but from Moovit is is a dual direction line, but only 15 min intervals are listed. The other similar route of 151, 173 are having 2 terminus, so I assume most of the trunk line are the same.
--- I checked Rapid's Pulse App and the way they present 170 is like a loop route, ie no option to change terminus. Whereas 151 and 173 has that option. This was consistent with my bus ride although Pulse's LRT stop for route 170 is a bit different than reality. I mapped that difference.

I was using the my50 pass so I didnt notice the fares. But I can remove that for now.
When I took the bus, it didn't really stop for long at the supposed second terminus at LRT Sentul. It just continued it's path back to Wira Damai.
My understanding of two terminus routes is that there will be specific departure times from each terminus.
What do you think?

Will you be updating the public_tranport relations too?
I notice at Kwasa Sentral it's still SBK05 not KG05

I'm truly sorry about this. I'm actually working solo as the new local Kaart mapper. Been mostly relying on local knowledge and mapillary images and feedback from the Telegram group. I did have a walkthrough with styles regarding the unclassified routes but i guess i misunderstood the service road tags. I'll put a halt to my activities for now and review whatever i've done. Do advise if there are glaring errors for me to fix.

I did check the convention on the wiki and from my previous understanding I have been changing roads that only access commercial areas with no through traffic to be service roads. is it wrong?