Thanks for giving this some thought. I'm fine keeping it as tertiary, you're making good points. I am waiting to see what happens with the northernmost section of 500E.

Reconstruction of 200 S between 7th and State is almost done, reducing the road to two travel lanes, two dedicated bus lanes, and two bike lanes. I think it's currently a tertiary and I am inclined to keep it that way in spite of the reduced # of travel lanes—and probably a lower speed limit, although that hasn't been posted yet. It's still "more" than an unclassified I would say. Thoughts?

Hey Kepler, how's it going? Do you have time to see if this flag is the old or the new design? And keep an eye on it if / when it updates?

I added them all by hand in individual changesets based on official UTA data and aerials / survey.

The names are the official names that UTA lists for the stops in their data. Since the names are rendered on most maps, I figured it'd be nicer to keep them that way. The wiki[1] doesn't say anything about expanding abbreviations, but if you feel strongly about it let's discuss.

[1] highway=bus_stop#Basic_tags

Hi Krako73
Technically the Bonneville Salt Flats are part of the West Desert (Great Salt Lake Desert). They could either be independent features or they could be some kind of relation, though I don't know what that would look like.
Best regards,
Martijn / mvexel

(sorry I may have asked you that before.. your username certainly is familiar..)

Thanks for your comments and insights! Please correct my edits where you know them to be wrong. I was going off of the most recent aerial imagery I could find, but sometimes that does not show the level of detail needed to make these calls of disused vs active vs abandoned. I probably should have been a bit more cautious.

I agree with your interpretation of abandoned vs disused.

If you're local, come to the SLC Mappers meetup sometime! Keep an eye on osmcal.org for the next meetup.

I'll delete it because I don't know where it should be. So I'll leave it up to you to add it again in the correct place. Enjoy your vacation!

Hello! Did you mean to create this cafe on the south pole?

Ah, in that case it's probably best to create two or more separate nodes inside of the building and add the addresses for all apartments on those separate nodes. This is not a hard and fast rule though. Alternative approaches listed here: osm.wiki/Addresses#Buildings_with_multiple_house_numbers

Thanks for the updates! I noticed that you added address information on the building polygon as well as one of the points in the polygon as well, this is not needed. Let me know if you have any questions!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132279302

Thanks for the update!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132322248

Usually I mark something as a driveway only when it belongs to a single home, otherwise just highway=service and if there's no public access access=private.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132083846

The section NE of Thornfield looks to be private, but the section SW looks like it has several houses abutting it.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132084031

what makes something 'excessive' instead of just 'detailed'?

Looks like there were only 4 objects in the world with the `magic_wand` key and the only one I did not create seems to have been deleted in the meantime:
```
@id @timestamp @uid @user
1112396011 2022-11-11T22:48:09Z 8909 mvexel
1112537334 2022-11-12T18:19:20Z 8909 mvexel
1112538818 2022-11-12T18:28:43Z 8909 mvexel
14943686 2022-11-28T06:13:04Z 8102530 OilStation
```

Removed those tags in changeset/129606602

I guess these should be deleted. I don't know what the best practice is for indicating source on features but I agree this is probably not it.

looking great! thanks for all the map updates!

Nice!

Oh thanks, I did not know about that! Thanks.