Thanks for the quick add! Within hours of opening, I think?

Also because 1300S continues all the way to redwood and beyond (as California Ave) whereas 1700S and 900S kind of dead end on the W side. 800S (and Indiana) on the other hand could be Secondary?

I agree with 1300 S, not so sure about 1700 S. I would argue keep 900 E and 1700 S tertiary, change 1300 S to secondary.

Awesome, thanks!

Makes sense. I don't like that intersection. Cross it on my bike from time to time going up Sunnyside. Glad they're thinking of ways to make it safer.

Interesting, I had not seen that yet! Do you know why they removed it?

Great. I'm open to hosting somewhere convenient to Utah County mappers from time to time. I know there are quite a few of you :)

Hi NebSgird, thank you for contributing to OSM in the SLC area! Would you mind uploading your changes a little more often? This is a best practice in OSM and makes it easier for other mappers to review your edits.

In case you are local, please also check out our meetup group for upcoming OSM meetups: https://www.meetup.com/OpenStreetMap-Utah/

Thanks,
mvexel

Reverted in changeset/121630451

See https://imgur.com/a/u8ev7wm for a visual of the features I deleted (and reverted)

Sorry, I'll revert it, but there are some very strange looking triangle shaped building areas, perhaps you can take a look?

I go to Liberty Park multiple times a week and have added many things to OSM there, but never thought to add this island :) Thanks!

Hi Xephorix, thanks for contributing to OSM in Utah! Could I ask a favor -- please try to limit the number of changes between uploads and add a more descriptive comment? That way it's easier for others to follow what you edited. Thanks!

Hi Xephorix,
Could you try to be a little more specific in the description of your changeset, please? This changeset covers quite a large area and a few dozen OSM objects, and it would help other mappers to have something more descriptive than "changed a few things". Thank you!

Completely agree on the access tags. Although I think access is limited to certain hours? Don't they close the gates at night?

I think you are correct in assuming that every cemetery needs a Cypress Ave :D

Oh cool! You may be interested to know that over the past few months I have been adding all UTA bus stops (manually) from the UTA dataset that is made available through the UGRC data portal. My next move was to incorporate all these stops into full bus route relations. The relations for the routes mostly already exist, but the stops can be added to the route relation as well. This will be a lot of work so please help if you can! In the process, I have also moved stop nodes to the correct location (as observed via aerials or street view images from Mapillary or Kartaview) where the original data was wrong. So this may be useful data to bring back to UTA as well.

Totally the spirit of OSM, isn't it? Someone else will come around and do another survey and add more detail... Perhaps it will be one of us..?

These names are going to trip up search services based on OSM data sending people to Main St on the cemetery instead of downtown :)
Seriously, I've seen this behavior. Perhaps `access` tags will help. I think the cemetery is generally open to vehicle traffic but `access=customer` or something like that may help.

Same, I was going to take the train to check it out and do the mapping! Which I may still do just because I am curious, but thanks for adding the new station!

I can't do that all by myself Keith! :D

this is actually adding a bus stop, selected the wrong description from JOSM drop down.