Also, just to clarify, some Abitab and RedPagos do have money exchange service, but to know for sure you have to enter and ask. Having an exchange rates table in the window is also indicator that they probably do exchange money.

Is seems that in those cases is better to add a another node with amenity=bureau_de_change

No te preocupes no hay semaforos ahi. Ya lo vi bien hoy. Lo que hay es una señal que indica semaforos proximos.

This changeset is 3 years old and set the max speed of all streets in the city.

I see no relation with the surface tag. What did you mean?

You can see some pedestrian prohibition signals and fences here node/917501068 and node/917596214 which prohibits the crossing in one of the two sidewalks.

Yes. Pedestrians are prohibited only if explicity signaled or impeded with fences.

I do not make the traffic rules. And for safety they shouldn't be able to cross, and maybe a barrier protect them, but it is legally allowed and common practice to cross like this. Also is common that pedestrians do not respect traffic lights, and walk by the street very close to the fence, or vandalize the fence to cross anywhere...

Obviously, if a fence is vandalized you shouldn't draw a footway there, or if you draw because with the broken fence there is a real crossing there, I would tag as "access=no"

In Uruguay and Argentina there are also lots of "pirate" access to motorways or highways, access that are not legal, but anyway used by a lot of people because the are no barriers, then as you have to map the real world (the "pirate" access is there) but, for example, map in a way that the routing engines understand them and avoid routing through them.

If you mean foot paths like this way/314768741 or this way/314768741 they are maped because pedestrian can cross there.

¿Is there any other way to model this?

Thanks.

It's prefered to have no surface tagged, than have the wrong surface tagged. The first is an omission, the last is an error.

If you see asphalt, then your ground survey is wrong or low quality! You should stop making changes based on this survey, to first check the quality of the survey and try to find how those errors were introduced in the survey. If not you will probably "inadvertently" continue adding bad data, only that those next times it won't be inadvertently because there were a lots of warnings about the quality of the survey.

This is not a case of "one feature, one osm element", is about where the feature/element is located.

The main activities of the restaurant are inside the main bulding, food is cooked, ordered, and served in the main building. The light building has only seatings for customers, just like some other restaurants has seatings outside in a sidewalk or a pedestrian street.

Jorge, puede ser, es que han sido decenas de usuarios y cientos de changesets, concentrados en poco tiempo, muchos cometiendo el mismo tipo de error, da trabajo corregirlos y si se corrige algo al poco tiempo vuelven a hacerlo mal (el mismo u otro colaborador del grupo) y eso me ha quitado la tranquilidad habitual.

La coordinación debería mejorarse. Sobre los cambios seria bueno que su descripción fuera mas clara, mas explícita, para ubicar la organización mas fácilmente (agregar una url del wiki, o algún medio de contacto centralizado), y en el tipo de cambio que estan haciendo ("ej, "Agregar tag 'surface', "Agregar tag 'lanes'")

Una cosa es que falte información en el mapa, y otra que agreguen información incorrecta. Lo primero es normal y aceptable, lo segundo es algo a evitar.

Lo otro es que deberían tener como principio, es para los elementos que ya están mapeados, evaluar mejor si están mejorando, o no, la calidad del dato.
Dibujar un poligono y ponerle "building" no agrega nada porque en zona urbana densa los limites de los edificios dificilmente son apreciables con la calidad de imagen aerea disponible, asi que dibujan cualquier cosa, e informacion que estaba en un nodo y era preciso (el nodo estaba al menos dentro del elemento real), se convierte en algo que pretende ser mejor pero es peor, ya que los limites no son los reales y debieran serlo, para eso es mejor dejar el nodo.

AND WEHRE DID YOU SEE ASPHALT IN way/305316206
or way/180834256
?????????????????????

SOURCE?????????

DO NOT DRAW ROUNDED STREETS WHERE THEY ARENT NONE!!!!!

STOP DELETING NODES OF FUEL STATIONS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

YOU ARE TRASHING THE MAP!!!!!!!!!

WHRE THE FCK DO YOU SEE ASPHALT IN way/78105016 ?
REDOUBLE OR TRIPLE CHECK YOUR SOURCE!!!

PLEASE DO NOT ADD BAAAAAADDDDD DATA. ITS PREFERRED TO NOT HAVE DATA THAN TO HAVE IT WRONG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

DO NOT CONVERT NODES TO WAYS!!!!!!!!!!!!
YOU ARE TRASHING THE MAP, ADDING BAD DATA, DESTROYING HISTORY OF EXISTING DATA AND NOT IMPROVING PRECISION

ALSO YOUR SOURCE IS NOT WHAT YOU DECLARE. IT IS NOT POSSIBLE TO MAP WHAT YOU ARE MAPPING USING THEM. DECLARE THE REAL SOURCE YOU ARE USING.

THE ROOF IS THE ROOF, THE FUEL STATION IS MORE THAN THE ROOF. DO NOT DELETE THE FUEL STATION NODES!!!!

NOOOO!!!!!!. DO NOT CHANGE THINGS ALREADY MAPPED WITHOUT KNOWLEDGE OF THE CONTEXT. Colegio Savio was mapped well. TWO DIFFERENT SCHOOLS IN THE SAME BUILDING. SO poolygon was tagged bulding=school but no amenity=school.

NO BORRAR LOS ATM CUANDO ESTAN SEPARADOS DEL BANCO. EL BANCO Y EL ATM TIENEN POR EJEMPLO, DISTINTOS HORARIOS.

No hay servicios bancarios way/457362116

Pase por la zona hace pocos dias y no me acuerdo de haber visto ests semaforo de Juan A Rodriguez. ¿Estas seguro?