Hola. Solo se mapean elementos como son en la realidad. Esto no es un hospital. es una oficina comercial.

Hola. Gracias por los aportes. Va review que pediste.

* Los elementos tienen dirección postal (etiquetas addr:* ) si es que realmente la tiene. Creo que no seria este el caso.

* Etiqueta "operator": No va cualquier texto descriptivo, sino que va quien opera el elemento, ya sea la "Intendencia de Canelones" o lo que corresponda. Conviene agregar la etiqueta operator:wikidata con la referencia al item en wikidata para garantizar que no hay ambiguedades.

Hi. Please do not blindly follow iD suggestions. All those schools should be tagged operator:type=public, not government.

I agree that it may seem logical, and even safer, if it were set that way, but the problem is that it does not reflect real-world conditions. These kinds of inconsistencies should first be addressed by local authorities by establishing the appropriate restrictions, and only then should they be added to the map.

In many places, you simply cannot assume that authorities have made a good or logical choice. Just a few days ago, I reached an intersection with a traffic_calming=bump where the highway=stop sign was placed on the road I was about to cross...

Hola, podes mapear lo que sea de tu interés, pero no cambiar las veredas por ciclovias. Si hay ciclovia, bicisenda o lo que sea, agregala, pero no elimines la vereda.

Hi. On what basis did you made this change? Mapillary imagery in Aug. 2025 show no evidence of oneway signals.

OK. Here an open gate does not imply that. Almost all private plots should be tagged with access=private with a few exceptions where customers need to access the premises like some hotels or restaurants.

Hi. On what basis did you add access=permissive to a lot of gates in this and other changesets lately?

The problem with adding that label is that it applies to any motor vehicle, but in practice the reality is more restrictive. See access=*

Obviously motorcar=yes and goods=yes would be OK to add without doubt, also single tracked vehicles, but e.g. hgv are explicitly forbidden.

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=821256782659980

Hi. This is a pedestrianized street, not a service road.

Hola. En varios de estos radares falto agregar el maxspeed que controlan. Si lo conoces estaria bueno agregarlo.

Another problem is that if you delete nodes the history of the data is not lost but preety much hard to find.

My advice to solve both problems, or at least what i try to do when editing in this kind of cases, is to put the old POI node as "entrance=main", and moving the rest of the data to the way.

Hi. There is a small problem that is (or can be) introduced when changing an element which is mapped as a node, and transform to an area, which is when some user in a mapping app ask to do to e.g. an hospital, when the POI is a node, that's ok, but when the POI is a area, you should also map entrances, so the app can find the right coordinates and route the user to the right place. In small places the problem is not much visible, but as the size of the POI gets bigger it becomes a problem.

Sure, thanks. Aerial imagery was misleading in this case. Please check street level imagery, as this is clearly a pedestrian way. Vehicles are allowed, but it is a pedestrian road (was pedestrianized a few years ago)

Is seems you are following iD suggestions blindly. Please don't follow them if you are not sure. The operator:type should be "public" according to the wiki description of the tag.

Hola. No son correctos esos datos. La estacion no tiene nombre. ANCAP es marca asi que va en la etiqueta "brand". y por supuesto, mucho menos "official_name".

Hi. What did you base this change on?

Hi. These are not streets, nor service ways.

Un adelantado a su epoca el Charly...