Your building shapes are far too big. Each single buildings needs a separate shape. All buildings should be squared out.
I'm going to revert all your edits.

Szakha, you building shapes are far bigger than the imagery. Also none of the buildings is squared out.
I'm going to revert your changeset.

Please square out buildings and match exactly the imgagery. thanks.

Hi Mr Chinnam,

I'm going to revert your contributions in Nicaragua. They do not match our standards. All building shapes should be squared out and match exactly the sat imagery. Most of your shapes are far too big.

Please compare to other building shapes in Nicaragua. Thanks.

Edmond,

Your building shapes are far too big compared to the aerial imagery. Please narrow down your shapes.

I'm going to revert your last changeset.

Hi,
Again - please narrow down the shapes of your buildings. This large building on your changeset has on the aerial imagery maybe 20% of the surface. You combined several buildings in an L-shape and made a big square of it.

Please narrow down the shapes of your buildings. Nearly all of the are too big. Thank you.

Hi,

Your building shapes are mostly too big compared to the aerial imagery. Do not include shadows and empty spaces around buildings please.

Thank you for your contribution to OSM Nicaragua

Phil,

Please stop using the tag house=house for buildings. The correct tag is building=yes.
Also please square out all building.

Thank you

Please square out your buildings. Thank you.

Hi,

Please narrow down you buildings shapes. Don't include several buildings in one shape. Don't include farmyards into the building shape.
Thank you.

Hi, I already corrected and deleted these buildings. If you check the history of the node=11991870599, you will see that I modified it 2x after your inital creating. So the buildings match now the aerial imagery.

Hi Sheryl,

Please don't add generic names to building shapes.

Also please square out 99% of the building shapes.

Thank you for contributing to OSM Nicaragua.

Hi fsilve,

Your building shapes in OSM are often far bigger than the aerial imagery. I'm going to delete them, I'm sorry.

Thanks for contributing to OSM Nicaragua.

Hi Shridhar,

Please square out all buildings shapes (or 99%). Please narrow down your shapes to match the aerial imagery. I'm going to delete some of your shapes, they are far bigger than the imagery.

Thank you for contributing to OSM Nicaragua.

Please stop adding these crappy building shapes. This is considered vandalism!

This is simply VANDALISM!

Connie,
Your buildings shapes are far bigger than the satellite imagery. I'm going to delete them all.

Sofia,
Your building shapes are far bigger than the actual aerial imagery. I'm going to delete them.
Please narrow down your buildings to match exactly the satellite imagery. Thanks.

Adriana,

I delete a few of your recent building shapes - they were far bigger than the aerial imagery. Please narrow down your shapes to the imagery without shapes or empty space around the house.
Thank you.

AShwini,

Your building shapes are far too big. I'm going to delete them.
Please narrow down to match exactly the aerial imagery.