pars51 på Mapillary billedet du har linket er den ikke bredere end en cykelsti.

Bedre vinkel her, fra august 2021:
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=418604276218548

På dette billede fra august 2012, ligner det helt bestemt en cykelsti.

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=418604276218548

What. Er vejen til Seminarievej VIRKELIG en highway=service?
way/116751458

Er du fuldstændigt sikker på det? Det virker simpelthen så mærkeligt.

"This segments appears to be bidirectional in SDFE. Is any other ground-truth available for further review?"

Why should it not be?

Vehicles from west could perfectly make a left turn (going north) from here.

Ground truth from Mapillary also confirms this.

and here:

node/4993786148/history

node/4993786149/history

Further examples here:

node/4993786132/history

node/4993786133/history

Please do NOT mislabel tramstops as busstops. You are destroying correct data and replacing it with wrong data.

Be more careful with your edits.

Examples here:

node/4993785976/history

node/4993785977/history

Be aware when mapping. You accidently moved the sea lantern to a very wrong position. I have corrected the mistake.

node/5325949270/history

Beware!

you are removing correct tagging and replacing it with wrong tagging.

The effect is that you are putting access=no on a main road.

access:lanes=|no means that there is TWO lanes, where the right lane is access=no

access:lanes=no means that there is ONE lane and that lane is access=no

You replaced the first with the second which is completely wrong. Please make sure to read the tagging guides thoroughly again.

access=*

osm.wiki/Lanes

Please do not add railway=platform to ordinary platforms for busses. This is completely wrong, as there is no railway there.

Damn, jeg glemte at kigge på datoen for noten på konstruktionsarbejdet. Det må helt klart være overstået.

Hermed fjernet. Tak :)

tak! :)

Damn, du er hurtig! :D

Hvor har vi nye luftfotos henne? :)

Husk at tjekke om der allerede er angivet cykelstier, inden du tilføjer nye.

Stop adding wrong turn restrictions! You obviously have no clue what you are doing.
I have reverted your changes.

Hehe, tak. Har bare tegnet det som de allerede havde kreeret i virkeligheden :)

Ved ikke hvad jeg lige tænkte på dér :D

Min hjerne tænkte Viborg men fingrene skrev Randers. Ville ønske der var funktionalitet til at kunne rette beskrivelser.

do*

- or du you mean to maybe group them into a bit smaller regions and span them over maybe 4-5 changesets?

Also for correcting obvious typos, where the exact changes are described in the changeset description?