Good morning, according to Wiki the sub-key "tower:*" would require a "man_made=tower". Does this match with "man_made=mast"?
And shouldn't "description:en" be used for a bilingual description?
Best regards
mcliquid

Ja, in dem Changeset hab ich tatsächlich nur die Ampeln auf ihre Stopp-Position verschoben.
Ansonsten verwende ich die Verkehrszeichenebene von Mapillary in JOSM und dieses Tool: https://trafficsigns.osm-verkehrswende.org/

Viele Grüße!

The entire Bregenzerwald is made up of hundreds of small hamlets, which are gradually being grouped together into village associations. The hamlet of Melisau was grouped into the municipality of Egg. In order to be able to correctly read the GIS in Austria, it is necessary to become familiar with the operation there, as it is not possible to insert unnamed residential roads in the GIS. For this reason, all residential roads throughout Austria always have a name, which is incorrect in reality. In order for "addr:street" to be used, a physical street name on a sign is required. See example: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Haselstauden-Stra%C3%9Fenschilder.jpg
Respectively, the name must have been dedicated to the street. This is not the case here, there is no sign. The hamlet is called "Melisau", so "addr:place" was already correct before.

It is correct that the addresses here are "Melisau 123, 6863 Egg", but Melisau is not a single street, but the entire village. I am therefore changing it back so that it matches the more than 100 other villages with the same system. Thank you.

See our a screenshot from our official GIS: https://ibb.co/ZJjGbNC

*official and legal name

Hello, the street here is definitely not called "Melisau", there is no street sign for it. The official and official name here is "Bregenzerwaldstraße". The addr:-tags should therefore remain in place.

Auf dem Weg sind Fußgänger und Radfahrer erlaubt sowie die Fahrzeuge der Rheinregulierung. Damit sind keine Pferde, Kutschen oder andere Verkehrsteilnehmer erlaubt, aber auch nicht per Schild verboten. In dem Fall würde ich wie bei jedem anderen 17aa bicycle und foot auf designated setzen und für die Rheinregulierung motor_vehicle auf private. Man könnte motor_vehicle wie gesagt auch komplett weglassen.
Bei jedem anderen 17aa Weg fügt man ja auch kein "schneepflug=yes" hinzu, wegen dem Winterdienst. Oder verstehe ich den Fall falsch? Was würdest du denn setzen und warum?

Hallo, ich nehme an hier sind Fahrzeuge der Rheinregulierung gemeint, deshalb "motor_vehicle=private", da man hier nicht so einfach an ein "permit" kommt. Man könnte argumentieren, dass die Rheinregulierung vermutlich ohnehin nicht mit OSM navigiert und deshalb "no" setzen.

Hi,

please note: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!

As far as I can tell, the names were taken from Wikipedia.

Nevertheless, changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!

Hi,

please note: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!

Hi,

please note: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!

Hi,

please note: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!

Hallo und Danke für deine Änderungen hier. Ich habe diese Änderungen teilweise zurückgesetzt da du hier (vermutlich unabsichtlich) die Grenze zwischen Bregenz und Lauterach verschoben hast.

Hallo und Danke für deine Änderungen. Ein "landuse=meadow" ist hier falsch, da es für landwirtschaftliche Flächen der Nutztierhaltung verwendet werden soll. Dies ist innerstädtisches Begleitgrün und damit ist landuse=grass völlig korrekt.

Hi,

please note: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!

Where is it written how much play equipment a playground needs as a minimum?

Which minimum requirements that a path must fulfill are missing here? Depending on the water level, you can always walk right up to the waterline here and the trail is always clearly visible on site.

Is a pipeline linked to a minimum diameter? And where does it say that the water there is not drinkable? There is no sign for it.

Stop this edit war.