OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
147518855

Hi,

please note: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!

147454947

Hi,

please note: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!

147364493

Hi,

please note: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!

147364807

Hi,

please note: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!

147307445

Hi,

please note: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!

147317928

Hi,

please note: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!

147323839

Hi,

please note: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!

147344670

Hi,

please note: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!

147268498

Hi,

please note: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!

147268500

Hi,

please note: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!

147268501

Hi,

please note: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!

147272209

Hi,

please note: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!

147192957

Hallo, wenn bei einem Objekt "addr:place" bereits gesetzt ist, darf "addr:street" nicht ergänzt werden. Die beiden Werte widersprechen sich!

Hello, if "addr:place" is already set for an object, "addr:street" must not be added. The two values contradict each other!

147152323

Hallo, wenn diese Strecke keine Verbindungspiste ist, sondern eine normale Abfahrtspiste, sollte dann nicht der Name "Verbindungsstrecke" auch geändert werden?

way/1222073469

147155921

Hi,

please note: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!

147136347

Ich hab das mal im Forum gepostet und bin gespannt was andere sagen. Mit Knotenpunktnetzwerken kenne ich mich ehrlichgesagt nicht aus.
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/knotenpunktnetzwerk-in-vorarlberg/109003

147128919

Hallo, ich hatte offensichtlich falsch verstanden, dass die Angabe veraltet bzw. nicht dokumentiert sei und deshalb "emergency=ambulance_station" vorzuziehen wäre.

Welche Bedeutung hat "emergency_service=ambulance" im Vergleich zu "emergency=ambulance_station"?

Und wenn es ein relevantes, aktiv genutztes Tag ist, warum ist es dann nicht korrekt dokumentiert?
osm.wiki/Proposal:Emergency_service
osm.wiki/w/index.php?title=Tag:emergency_service%3Dambulance&action=edit&redlink=1
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/meaning-of-undocumented-emergency-service-values/108859

Danke dir!

147136347

Hallo metjowagner, ich möchte Dich nicht in Deinem Tatendrang bremsen, aber aus meiner Sicht qualifizieren sich unsere Vorarlberger Wanderwege nicht für ein Knotenpunktnetz.
Für ein Knotenpunktnetz müssten auf den Wegweisern die Nummern der nächsten Wegweiser stehen, was aber nicht der Fall ist.
In Vorarlberg sind alle Wegweiser nummeriert, aber keine Knotenpunktwegweiser. Siehe dazu auch die Definition bzw. das Bild im Wiki: osm.wiki/DE:Tag:network:type%3Dnode_network

Aufgrund welcher Eigenschaft klassifizierst du das Vorarlberger Wanderwegenetz als Knotenpunktnetz?

Danke dir für deine Rückmeldung.

147139196

Hallo PiJu, wenn bei der Adresse "addr:place" bereits gesetzt ist, darf nicht noch zusätzlich "addr:street" gesetzt werden. In Faschina gibt es keine Straßennamen im klassischen Sinne. Danke!

140591277

Passt, danke für deine Rückmeldung :)