Hi belugabob, and welcome to Openstreetmap! Your edit looks good to me, thanks for updating the map with the new layout.

The only improvement I'd make is that you have split the cycleway up into three parts for what seems to be no reason (I'm happy to be corrected!) - ways 235219134; 554875249 and 554875250. If there's no difference in tagging between them then it's generally neater to keep ways in one section.

No response so I've undeleted them in changeset/55548041.

Hello!
I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55353492

Thanks pcbbc, and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

Hi Dan, did you mean to remove ways 540057208 and 540057209? They were mapped recently by michaelinredhill so I would be surprised if the waterways didn't exist any more.

Thanks and welcome to OpenStreetmap!

Hello!
I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55269266

Hi Davezilla, and welcome to Openstreetmap.

Thanks for your edits to Horsham. Just letting you know that I've undeleted node/558647746 as it had address information which I would assume is still correct - let me know if that's not the case. I've marked the restaurant (Sanmae) as disused.

No response so the residential area has been undeleted in changeset/54442530.

Hi Mike,

I've carried out a bit more work on these three buildings (changeset/54415729 if you want to check)
- Added smoking=yes to way/544250782 from the node that was deleted in this changeset.
- Merged the Andrew Lyons node into way/544250762.
- changed ways 544250762 and 70007760 to building=retail.

Hi, did you mean to delete the residential way/22814436 around Horley?

Hi İbrahim Yurdakul ,

Thanks for adding this information to the map. You've added the CAA node twice - I guess this may be a maps.me issue? Also you could add the information directly to the building (way/23687379) rather than creating additional nodes.

Matt

Sorry, not to the west. I meant to the east. I knew I'd fall foul of Muphry's Law.

Hi,
Also, way/41527779 has source:designarion. Is this also a typo?

I changed a few ways with this tag to source:designation in changeset/51557361 but will hold off doing anything further for the moment as there are a lot of ways with source:designarion to the west of here.

Thanks, I've added a fixme and will re-survey when I next pass by.

Hello Dave, thank you for your contributions and welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Regarding the bus stop (node/5041516821) - there is an existing bus stop just to the south on the northbound side of Bury Road. Is there more than one bus stop going north? If not I'd suggest editing the existing node rather than creating a duplicate.

Hi Rikki, do the footpaths follow the path of the service roads mapped in this changeset or are they actually separate?

Hi Dan, thanks for updating these shops. Do you have any idea what will be replacing the cafe? It may be worthwhile keeping the node but removing the cafe and name tags as currently there is useful address information that will be lost.

To answer your fixme question on way way/267484437 - good spot, you're right. This isn't and has never to my knowledge been a cycleway. I'll change it back to a footway.

Hi Jake's Cars, I'm reverting this change too as it was tagged correctly before. Only the very end is surfaced in asphalt, the majority is surfaced in paving stones (well, I call them bricks, but I'm following the wiki). There are photos of the road on Mapillary to confirm.