OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
72546641

Hi Sinh, I drove past today and the pub has definitely been closed for a while. I've updated the pub and car park in changeset/72573823.

70917319

Hi Phill,
I passed by this area today, did you mean to delete way/679195994? It still exists on the ground so should stay on the map. Also the Downs Link is still being routed further to the south, is the current position where it will go when construction is finished?
Thanks, Matt

63118796

Hi Dan, careful when adding possessive apostrophes - it's Piries Place on the ground, not Pirie's.

62810109

Thanks for replying so quickly. The dictionary definition is a little misleading with regards to OSM data and sounds to me like it's describing a frontage road:osm.wiki/Frontage_road

The commonly accepted definition of a service road in OpenStreetMap can be found here: highway=service

62810109

Hi Jake, highway=service doesn't prohibit public access to the estate by itself (that's what access=* tags are for). This road is a dead end only used to access the businesses, so highway=service seems appropriate to me.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/62810109

58949154

Done, thanks. :)

58949154

Hi Dave, I'm not sure about the name 'muddy cut through' for way/85621725. That's more of a description (albeit an accurate one!)

Is it a local name for the path? If so then loc_name would be more appropriate.

57784203

Thanks for looking, yes I tagged this with a review_requested for a couple of reasons. Firstly I was doing it from memory (although I just noticed I put source=survey, oops) and couldn't remember the exact geometry of Dunelm and TK Maxx (I happened to have the chance to survey it a couple of days later and made some corrections in changeset/57847906). More importantly it's the first time I've tagged using the level schema so thought I'd flag it just in case I'd misunderstood how it was intended to work.

56672808

No problem, I don't usually have the time to do a full survey but I'm filling in details and updating features from memory when I notice them. :)

56603411

Hi Phill, thanks again for the continued updates. Just a tip with the construction area in this changeset - it's a good general rule of thumb to avoid linking areas and ways together like you have done here: osm.wiki/Editing_Standards_and_Conventions#Areas_and_Ways_Sharing_Nodes

Practically, it makes it harder to edit if the construction area changes in the future (likely!). Also the way is often drawn along the centreline of the road. I've made some changes to this area in changeset/56646994

56520892

Hi Phill, thanks for your recent edits. Just to let you know that you joined way/562741029 to part of the North Horsham admin boundary (way/222020434) instead of Redkiln Way. I've fixed this in changeset/56535280.

56219200

Thinking about it, opening_hours would probably be better.

56219200

Hi Dave, is the ice rink now back to being a volleyball court? If the ice rink is only open for a limited time each year it would be better to use a seasonal=* tag (or something similar)

56197374

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Does this lake really exist?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/56197374

55668073

You only have to make the changes once - the different zoom levels render at different times. The full technical explanation is pretty long and I'm no expert on it, so I won't be able to help ;-) but the changes will show up eventually. It's unlikely to take more than a few days.

55668073

Nice, thanks!

55654375

Hi belugabob, and welcome to Openstreetmap! Your edit looks good to me, thanks for updating the map with the new layout.

The only improvement I'd make is that you have split the cycleway up into three parts for what seems to be no reason (I'm happy to be corrected!) - ways 235219134; 554875249 and 554875250. If there's no difference in tagging between them then it's generally neater to keep ways in one section.

55427183

No response so I've undeleted them in changeset/55548041.

55353492

Hello!
I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55353492

55353492

Thanks pcbbc, and welcome to OpenStreetMap!