martien-176's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 167459288 | Due to bad buildings mappings |
|
| 167504338 | Due to bad buildings mappings |
|
| 166996213 | Due to bad buildings mappings |
|
| 167504449 | Due to bad building mappings |
|
| 166996180 | Due to bad building mappings |
|
| 166996146 | Reversed by changeset/167504517 |
|
| 167504517 | Due to bad buildings mappings. |
|
| 166995807 | Reversed with changeset/167504630, due to bad building mappings
|
|
| 166995950 | Reversed by changeset/167504562, due to bad building mapping.
|
|
| 166996180 | Reversed with changeset/167504449
|
|
| 166996213 | Reversed with changeset/167504338
|
|
| 166996253 | Reverted with changeset/167459288
|
|
| 166998109 | Changeset reverted with changeset/167459193 The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Always draw buildings as square and precise as you can. Then add the Building feature type. And last, right click it and click the square icon. Please check out these sources for more info:
Thanks so much for your contribution, Martien, HOT validator.
|
|
| 166998109 | Hi, thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But unfortunately they are all parallelogram shaped, while they should be square cornered and have some variation of rectangular. I notice this is not the only occasion you mapped this way. Please check out these educational resources, they will help you to improve your mappings:
Thanks so much for your contribution, Martien, HOT validator.
|
|
| 167100024 | Hi, thanks for mapping. A few buildings (esp. in the west side of changeset) need fixing: shadows were misinterpreted as building outlines, a service road was included in the building outline. Esri imagery is quite blurry, making the mapping quite a challenge), so i used Bing and Mapbox to help discern the correct outlines a bit better. Thanks and regards, Martien (global validator)
|
|
| 166507191 | Hi, thanks for mapping. You requested a review of your mappings. Buildings mappings look okay. One request: always add a changeset comment about what you did. Thanks and regards, Martien, HOT validator.
|
|
| 164730123 | Hi, thanks for mapping. You requested a review of your mappings. Your buildings are well mapped. Good location, square corners and precise outline. Thanks and regards, Martien, HOT validator.
|
|
| 164426363 | Hi, thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. You requested a review of your mappings. The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But pay attention to the squareness and accurateness of your mappings. Zoom in as close as possible to see the outline of the buildings, hit each corner of the building carefully. Look for shadows, open ground, changes in roof color and vegetation to differentiate buildings. Please check out these sources for more info:
Thanks so much for your contribution, Martien, HOT validator.
|
|
| 164383611 | Hi, thanks for mapping. You requested a review of your mappings. Your buildings are well mapped. Good location, square corners and precise outline. I notice some of your buildings mapping are a little bit offset to the what is visible on Esri. Maybe zoom in a bit more to get the corners more precisely. Thanks and regards, Martien, HOT validator.
|
|
| 164384048 | Hi, thanks for mapping. You requested a review of your mappings. Your buildings are well mapped. Good location, square corners and precise outline. One thing to keep in mind: to improve for next time, please zoom in close enough when tracing to avoid buildings sharing nodes or else overlapping. Thanks and regards, Martien, HOT validator.
|