Hi, thanks for mapping. You requested a review of your mappings.

Your buildings are well mapped. Good location, square corners and precise outline.

Thanks and regards, Martien, HOT validator.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164384523

Hi, thanks for mapping. You requested a review of your mappings.

Your buildings are well mapped. Good location, square corners and precise outline.

One thing to keep in mind: to improve for next time, please zoom in close enough when tracing to avoid buildings sharing nodes or else overlapping.

Thanks and regards, Martien, HOT validator.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164343678
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164344762

Hi, thanks for mapping. You requested a review of your mappings.

Your buildings are well mapped. Good location, square corners and precise outline.

One thing to keep in mind: to improve for next time, please zoom in close enough when tracing to avoid buildings sharing nodes or else overlapping.

Thanks and regards, Martien, HOT validator.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164343678

Hi, thanks for mapping. You requested a review of your mappings.

Your buildings are well mapped. Good location, square corners and precise outline.

Thanks and regards, Martien, HOT validator.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164291732

Hi, thanks for mapping. You requested a review of your mappings.

Your buildings are well mapped. Good location, square corners and precise outline.

Thanks and regards, Martien, HOT validator.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164293607

Hi, thanks for mapping. You requested a review of your mappings.

Your buildings are well mapped. Good location, square corners and precise outline.

One thing to keep in mind: next time, you can improve by avoiding mapping several buildings as one building. Every building must be traced separately. Zoom in as close as possible to see the outline of the buildings, hit each corner of the building carefully. Look for shadows, open ground, changes in roof color and vegetation to differentiate buildings.

Thanks and regards, Martien, HOT validator.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164282773

Hi, thanks for mapping. You requested a review of your mappings.

Your buildings are well mapped. Good location, square corners and precise outline.

One thing to keep in mind: next time, you can improve by avoiding mapping several buildings as one building. Every building must be traced separately. Zoom in as close as possible to see the outline of the buildings, hit each corner of the building carefully. Look for shadows, open ground, changes in roof color and vegetation to differentiate buildings.

Thanks and regards, Martien, HOT validator.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164283260

Hi, thanks for mapping. You requested a review of your mappings.

Your buildings are well mapped. Good location, square corners and precise outline.

One thing though: next time, you can improve by avoiding mapping several buildings as one building. Every building must be traced separately. Zoom in as close as possible to see the outline of the buildings, hit each corner of the building carefully. Look for shadows, open ground, changes in roof color and vegetation to differentiate buildings.

Thanks and regards, Martien, HOT validator.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164283619

Hi, thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. You requested a review of your mappings.

The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Always draw buildings as square and precise as you can. Then add the Building feature type. And last, right click it and click the square icon.

Also please keep in mind: many buildings are very close but do not actually touch each other, try to map them close to each other without letting them connect or share nodes with each other, roads, or residential area outlines. In the iD web editor, holding down the "alt" key will keep nodes from "snapping" to each other and accidentally connecting.

Please check out these sources for more info:
- Buildings--> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o
- Roads--> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZBLwb2nisJQ
- https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit

Thanks so much for your contribution, Martien, HOT validator.

Hi, thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. You requested a review of your mappings.

The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But pay attention to the squareness and precise location of the corners. Always draw buildings as square and precise as you can. Then add the Building feature type. And last, right click it and click the square icon.

Please check out these sources for more info:
- Buildings--> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o
- Roads--> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZBLwb2nisJQ
- https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit

Thanks so much for your contribution, Martien, HOT validator.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164247343

Hi, thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. You requested a review of your mappings.

The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Always draw buildings as square and precise as you can. Then add the Building feature type. And last, right click it and click the square icon.

Please check out these sources for more info:
- Buildings--> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o
- Roads--> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZBLwb2nisJQ
- https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit

Thanks so much for your contribution, Martien, HOT validator.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164250812

Hi, thanks for mapping. You requested a review of your mappings.

Your buildings are well mapped. Good location, square corners and precise outline.

But stay vigilant to not map buildings overlapping other features. Many buildings are very close but do not actually touch each other, try to map them close to each other without letting them connect or share nodes with each other, roads, or residential area outlines. In the iD web editor, holding down the "alt" key will keep nodes from "snapping" to each other and accidentally connecting.

Thanks and regards, Martien, HOT validator.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164260450

Hi, thanks for mapping. You requested a review of your mappings.

Your buildings are well mapped. Good location, square corners and precise outline.

One tip to improve your mapping: avoid mapping several buildings as one building. Every building must be traced separately. Zoom in as close as possible to see the outline of the buildings, hit each corner of the building carefully. Look for shadows, open ground, changes in roof color and vegetation to differentiate buildings.

Thanks and regards, Martien, HOT validator.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164261646

Hi, thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. You requested a review of your mappings.

The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But pay attention to the squareness of the corners.

Also please take into account that trees can obscure the building outline, making it seem that it is not rectangular. While in actual fact it is.

Please check out these sources for more info:
- Buildings--> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o
- Roads--> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZBLwb2nisJQ
- https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit

Thanks so much for your contribution, Martien, HOT validator.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164260721

Please do not forget to add imagery detail when you upload your mappings.

It is regularly missing in your mappings.

Thanks.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162245232

Hi, parking amenity (part of survey data) was deleted, althoug recent imagery shows it is still there.

I reversed the changeset, see changeset/162327165
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162206586

165 buildings stacked on top of each other. Please stop this kind of mapping.

I reverted this changeset with changeset/161503688
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161491109

Landuse mapped as nodes is not correct. Fyi, this has been fixed with changeset/151191217
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150923331

Thanks for mapping.

The highways in this changeset are all giving access to housing. They do not lead to agricultural or forestry land. Therefore they should be tagged as residential instead of track. See for more info this wiki highway=*.

The only exception is way/1349355757. Because that is a through road between settlements it could best be tagged as unclassified.

Thanks again and regards.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161179310

Forgot to mention: please always add a comment to your changesets, preferably at the start of the comment line.

Doing that makes it easier for reviewers to immediatly see what you did and possible why.