Hi Jaka!

You tagged sidewalk=both on Cesta dveh cesarjev. way/327500693

However, last time I was there (which is a while ago), there was no sidewalk on neither side; just a soft shoulder.

This is also the case on 2020 aerial imagery. Has the situation changed in the meantime or should we correct this?

Hi!

You tagged cycleway=track on Cesta dveh cesarjev. way/327500693

However, last time I was there (which is a while ago), there was no cycle track on neither side. On 2020 aerial imagery, there is no track visible either. Has the situation changed in the meantime or should we correct this?

Hi!
It seems that you accidentally displaced way/622260002 with your edit (you moved the whole way by ~5m to the North West). I've just fixed that (changeset/129601703)

It would make it easier to understand your intentions if you comment your changesets.

Happy mapping!

I've tried to fix it.

Great, thanks!

Thanks for the clarificiation!

I've removed the sharrow tag from way/461406764

Hi,

You added cycleway:right=shared_lane to way/461406764

This implies that there are "sharrows" painted on the road (cycleway=shared_lane).

I don't think there are any such markings in the forward direction on this section of the road (only on way/887358256 and onward), but I'm not 100% sure.

Great job!

Good idea for the sub-page!

Just need someone motivated to do it... :-)

Oh nice, thanks! I wasn't aware of that wiki page. That's also the reason, why I created a bus-line section on the en:Ljubljana page a while ago: osm.wiki/Ljubljana

...which I think created some redundancy. I think in the long run, it would be good to have only one table and have the other wiki page simply link to that table.

The table in WikiProject_Slovenia/Javni_prevozi looks nicer to me, but it is not fully up to date.

I think this is ok as the tag is about the type of the building, not about its current use. From the wiki:

"[T]he value [of building=*] may be used to classify the type of building. Note that it may be not the same as the building's current use (tagged using building:use=*). For example, a hospital building that is abandoned or repurposed to be a marketplace is still a building=hospital"

4KK, please:
- do not insult people
- do not engage in edit wars.

If you disagree with another mapper whether this highway should be primary or secondary, please discuss this with them instead of editing back and forth. Preferrably discuss this kind of stuff in public, so other mappers understand what's going on.

OK sure. Thanks for improving OSM!

Happy mapping!

I made modifications only at locations where I was certain -- so there should not be any "ghost bents" or such

It is certainly more precise than it was previously. I think it has two advantages:

1) Even if there is a global offset of a few metres, the shape of the path is better represented.

2) The distances are more accurate if bents are represented more realistically.

I did record a gpx when I went there but unfortunately something went wrong when saving it. But I do remember the shape and position was unsatisfyingly unaccurate at times.

Feel free to revert if you believe the previous state was superior to the current in any way.

Great, thanks :-)

There is a note which disagrees with the opening hours you tagged on the parking. Do you have an idea who is correct?

note/3349203

way/974837171

...and I've moved to fixme from the power line to the power mast
node/1517026862

Thanks for the clarification. I've move the cables near RTP Bežigrad underground

Hi,
I don't understand the fixme on way/668307651

What is it that needs to be fixed?